UntitledGreen-top Guideline No. 193rd edition May 2011 Venous Thromboembolism and
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Venous Thromboembolism and Hormone ReplacementTherapy This is the third edition of this guideline, originally published in 1999 and revised in 2004.
Exogenous estrogens used in the combined oral contraceptive pill have long been recognised as causative factors in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE).1,2 Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), either sequential or continuous combined, also exposes women to exogenous estrogen and a number of case–control studies and prospective randomised trials have shown an increase in the relative risk of VTE in women on estrogen-containing HRT.3 In particular, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study in the USA assessed the major health benefits of oral HRT (0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen and 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA] daily) in a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial with more than 8000 women in each arm and confirmed an increase in the risk of pulmonary embolism (hazard ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.39–3.25).4 On the available evidence, however, a substantial risk of VTE may relate only to oral and not to transdermal preparations.3 Thus, the risk of VTE and the type of preparation must be considered in women starting or continuing HRT.
Identification and assessment of evidence
This guideline was developed using the standard methodology for developing RCOG Green-top Guidelines.5–7 Original articles for the evidence base for this guideline were obtained following a computer search for ‘hormone replacement' as a keyword and also in combination with ‘venous thrombosis' or ‘deep venous thrombosis' (DVT) or ‘pulmonary embolism' or ‘thrombophilia' applied to Medline (1966 to week 1, 2010), Embase (1980 to week 1, 2010), Evidence-based Medicine Reviews, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness to the last quarter of 2009. This was complemented by hand searching for individual references identified from these original articles. The levels of evidence and the grade of recommendations used in this guideline are detailed in RCOG Clinical Governance Advice No. 1a–c.5–7 Where possible, recommendations are based on, and explicitly linked to, the evidence that supports them. Areas lacking evidence are highlighted and annotated as good practice points. What are the changes in coagulation factors associated with HRT?
The mechanism whereby oral HRT provokes an increased risk of VTE is unclear.
The haemostatic system is altered by the menopause, with increases in a number of coagulation factors which are known to be associated with vascular risk.8–11 There have been a variety of assessments of the changes in coagulation factor levels associated with HRT. Not all of the changes that have been observed are prothrombotic. In particular, a reduction in fibrinogen12 and a reasonably consistent decrease in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels have been observed,13–20 suggesting an overall enhancement of fibrinolytic potential in those taking HRT. In addition, combination,21–23 though not unopposed,21,24,25 HRT may reduce factor VII levels. By contrast, oral HRT also reduces plasma levels of the natural anticoagulant protein S,12,26 although a consistent effect on reducing antithrombin levels has not been seen.23,27,28 Thus, the net effect of these changes must be considered. When considering the formation of venous thrombosis, the most clinically relevant laboratory assessments may be those relating to thrombin and fibrin generation. In this regard, although HRT may be associated with an increase in soluble fibrin generation,18 there is no consistent evidence of an increase in thrombin generation.13–20,29 Resistance to the effect of activated protein C (APCR) is also associated with venous thrombosis. Classically associated with inheritance of the factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, such resistance can also occur in the absence of the FVL mutation as an acquired phenomenon.30 This form of RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists resistance also relates to the level of thrombin generation.31 There are two main methods of assessment of acquired APCR and there is consistent evidence that oral HRT is associated with an increase in resistance when assessed by activation of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation.26,32–34 By contrast, no consistent effect has been shown when the resistance is assessed by activated partial thromboplastin-based methods.35–41 This is likely to relate to the differing sensitivities of the two methods to the plasma levels of coagulation factors. It is not clear, however, that higher APCR is associated with the occurrence of HRT-related VTE.34 Higher C- reactive protein levels are associated with both VTE42 and cardiovascular disease. Although estrogen- containing HRT does not increase all inflammatory markers,44 it is associated with an increase in C-reactive protein;41,44 however, this effect may be ameliorated by the addition of progestogen.45 By comparison, transdermal HRT appears not to be associated with such an increase in C-reactive protein46 and also has a lesser effect on coagulation than oral preparations.26,41 This may reflect the fact that oral preparations undergo first-pass hepatic metabolism and therefore have a greater effect on factors produced by the liver than transdermal preparations, which avoid the first-pass effect.23,41 How should VTE risk be approached when HRT is being considered?
All women commencing HRT should be counselled about the risk of VTE and the signs and symptoms
All women should be advised to access medical help rapidly if they suspect that they have developed
A recent systematic review of both observational studies and clinical trials examined the risk of VTE associated with the use of HRT in eight observational studies and nine clinical trials.3 In the majority of studies, the endpoint was the first occurrence of idiopathic VTE. The clinical trial and the observational studies produced a similar odds ratio of VTE associated with oral estrogen, of 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–3.1) and 2.5 (95% CI 1.9–3.4), respectively. From a further UK observational study, a VTE incidence rate of 4.2/1000 patient-years was observed in a 50–79-year-old group never exposed to HRT.47 This compares with an incidence rate of 5.8/1000 patient-years in women of a similar age exposed to combination HRT with conjugated estrogen. Reasonably comparable data from the US Women's Health Initiative (WHI) observational study48 revealed a lower risk in those not exposed to HRT of 1.6/1000 patient-years (mean age 64.7 years), but again showed a higher rate of 2.4/1000 patient-years in those exposed to combination HRT with conjugated estrogen (mean age 60.7 years). Thus, there is consistent evidence to demonstrate an increased relative risk of VTE, although the absolute risk, particularly in the absence of other risk factors, is low. Overall, the risk of VTE increases with age,49–52 with the absolute risk of VTE in women increasing particularly after the age of 45 years to around double that of younger women.53–55 As noted below, the epidemiological data relate VTE to the 1st year of HRT exposure, thus age and estrogen alone cannot be responsible for all of the increased VTE risk with HRT. It is possible that the VTE risk also relates to other underlying conditions such as obesity56 and thrombophilia.57 Moreover, there is beginning to be some evidence that different HRT preparations (see section 5 below) may result in different VTE risks.
Although information on transdermal preparations is limited, there are some data suggesting that transdermal therapy carries a lower risk of VTE than oral therapy, but the numbers studied have been small. The risk of VTE with transdermal compared with oral HRT is shown in Table 1. Of the six studies which provide some information,49,58–62 all show non-significant risks associated with transdermal preparations, with studies reporting an odds ratio greater than one being confined to those with fewer than 10 exposed cases.45,60,61 Consistent with this, Smith et al. did not find any significant risk associated with transdermal preparations irrespective of the dosage used (using 0.625 mg of estradiol as an index).63 A systematic review of HRT, which pooled the results of four of the above studies, revealed a non-significant odds ratio of VTE in association with transdermal RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Table 1. Risk of venous thromboembolism with transdermal compared with oral hormone replacement
Scarabin et al.56 Predominantly EE + P Predominantly EE + P Oral EE/CEE TD EE Douketis et al.59 Varas-Lorenzo et al.61 FCEE = conjugated estrogen; CI = confidence interval; EE = esterified estrogen; OR = odds ratio; P = progestogen; TD = transdermal; VTE = venous thromboembolism.
estrogen of 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), with very little evidence of statistical heterogeneity.3 However, this absence of thrombotic effect may not relate to all transdermal hormone therapy as an increased risk of VTE has been reported in association with a combined transdermal contraceptive containing 0.75 mg of estradiol.64 Women starting or continuing HRT should be counselled with regard to the perceived benefits and
possible risks for their individual situations, including consideration of alternative therapies.
A number of randomised controlled clinical trials have investigated the risks and benefits of HRT in postmenopausal women. Of these, the WHI study4 was designed to assess the prevention of coronary heart disease in women taking combined conjugated equine estrogen and MPA. After 5.2 years of follow-up, the trial was stopped as there was an increased risk of coronary heart disease (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.02–1.63), stroke (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.07–1.85) and breast cancer (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.0–1.59), as well as pulmonary embolism. The WISDOM trial was also designed with an emphasis on cardiovascular disease and dementia.65 Although terminated early on account of the WHI trial, analysis at a median of 11.9 months of follow-up (with the mean age of those randomised 62.8 years) also revealed a significant increase in the number of major cardiovascular events and VTE associated with the combined therapy of conjugated equine estrogen and MPA. However, neither trial specifically examined those younger subjects taking combined oral HRT for perimenopausal symptom relief. In younger individuals, the WHI group has also reported a reduction in coronary artery calcification in women who were 50–59 years of age and receiving estrogen only.66 From further analysis of WHI data,48,67 it seems likely that, at worst, HRT in younger women may be neutral with regard to the risk of cardiovascular disease and may be associated with an overall reduction in all-cause mortality. However, an increased risk of VTE48,67 and stroke68 at all ages still seems a likely consequence of HRT. It is clear, however, that the final interpretation of the WHI data is still a matter of considerable debate and controversy.69 Do HRT type and duration influence VTE risk?
The risks of VTE in association with HRT may be influenced by the type of preparation and the duration
of its use.
From the available evidence, the most convincing evidence relates to a greater risk in the 1st year of use than in subsequent years and a lack of continuing risk in those who have stopped HRT. Although requiring confirmation in larger studies, it also seems likely that there is a substantially lesser risk with transdermal compared with oral preparations and that the overall VTE risk with combination preparations may be influenced by the type of progestogen used.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 5.1 The influence of estrogen type The risk of VTE may be less with esterified estrogens compared with conjugated equine estrogen.
There is very limited information on whether the thrombosis risk varies with the type of estrogen.63 Although the risk of VTE may be less with esterified estrogens compared with conjugated equine estrogen,63 there is still evidence of a significant VTE risk with both types of estrogen.58 5.2 The effect of combination HRT There may be a greater risk of VTE with combination therapy and definitive information on individual
estrogen types is still lacking. However, the results to date suggest that therapy with estrogen alone is
associated with a significant VTE risk.
A number of studies allow some assessment of the potential influence of the addition of progestogen to estrogen therapy. For oral conjugated equine estrogen therapy, one study observed a significant VTE risk (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.60–5.40) with the addition of progestogen to estrogen, while observing a non-significant risk with estrogen alone.63 However, this study used unopposed esterified estrogen as the reference group for both comparisons and an assessment of the risk associated purely with the addition of a progestogen to conjugated estrogen (i.e. using conjugated estrogen alone as the reference group) was not calculated. Data derived from two WHI studies4,70 show a non-significant increased VTE risk with conjugated equine estrogen alone, with a significant increase in risk observed in a separate study of combination therapy. A comparable observation was made in studies of the UK General Practice Research Database71 when those receiving conjugated estrogen alone were compared with those receiving conjugated estrogen in combination with either MPA or norgestrel.63 This comparison revealed a significantly higher hazard ratio in those exposed to combined therapy. Similarly, with oral estradiol, a non-significant risk has been observed with estradiol alone and either a non-significant (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.91–2.47)63 or significantly increased risk (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9–7.0)58 with combination therapy. Other studies49,50,59–61 (with the notable exception of that by Jick et al.50) employing a variety of preparations also report an increased VTE risk associated with combination therapy. Two of these five studies also reported an increased risk associated with estrogen alone.49,50 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis3 which included four of the above studies49,50,60,61 as well as unpublished combined data on (predominantly) estradiol revealed a significant risk (with only moderate statistical heterogeneity) associated with estrogen alone (pooled OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6–3.0) and no significant additional risk associated with the addition of progestogen to oral estrogen (pooled OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.0–3.2).
5.3 The influence of progestogen type There is preliminary information available from Canonico et al.62 on the influence of particular progestogens on VTE risk. The group examined a combination of combined preparations including micronised progesterone, pregnane derivatives (dydrogesterone, medrogestone, chlormadinone acetate, cyproterone acetate and MPA) and norpregnane derivatives (nomegestrol acetate and promegestone), showing that micronised progesterone and pregnane derivatives may carry a lower thrombotic risk compared with norpregnane derivatives. These data on a differential risk varying by the type of progestogen need to be confirmed in further studies, with specific data also required on the VTE risk associated with newer progestogens such as drospirenone. 5.4 VTE relationship to estrogen dose There is some evidence that the effect of estrogen therapy may be dose related.
There is some evidence that the effect of estrogen therapy may be dose related, with no significant VTE risk associated with doses of oral estrogen of around 0.3 mg.49,63,72 A number of studies,49,50,58,60,72 RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists while often examining a mixture of estrogen types, show a higher VTE risk with estrogen doses of 1.25 mg or more (reporting ORs between 2.4 and 6.9) compared with 0.625 mg (with ORs between 1.7 and 4.3), although in many cases the confidence limits of these risks overlap.
Interestingly, Smith et al.63 described a significant dose–response relationship with conjugated estrogen but not with estradiol. Consistent with the results of Smith et al.,63 Canonico et al.62 describe no difference in risk in those receiving ≤1.5 mg oral or ≤50 micrograms transdermal (predominantly) estradiol preparations compared with the remainder of their study group. Overall, the results for conjugated equine estrogens are consistent with the demonstration that combined lower-dose HRT with conjugated equine estrogen produces no significant increase in prothrombin fragment 1+2 and a lesser reduction in antithrombin than higher-dose HRT.27 5.5 Transdermal preparations Transdermal preparations are associated with a substantially lower risk of VTE than oral preparations.
As discussed above, the available evidence suggests that transdermal preparations are associated with a substantially lower risk of VTE than oral preparations. 5.6 Duration of therapy The risk of VTE is highest in the 1st year of HRT use, with no evidence of continuing risk on stopping HRT.
There is a clear association between VTE and duration of HRT use (Table 2), particularly with a recent systematic review showing a significantly higher risk in those who had been taking oral estrogen for less than 1 year compared with those who had been taking it for more than 1 year.3 In this study, a combined odds ratio of 4.0 (95% CI 2.9–5.7) compared with 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.8) was observed.
Table 2. Risk of venous thromboembolism with duration of use of hormone replacement therapy
≤1 year versus >1.1–4.9 years Grodstein et al.72 <5 years versus first idiopathic 4.6≈ (2.5–8.4≈) ≤6 months versus first idiopathic Varas-Lorenzo et al.61 Høibraaten et al.87 Douketis et al.59 Scarabin et al.58 <1 year versus Comparisons other than <1 year versus >1 year are as indicated in the comments section. CC = case–control study; CEE = conjugated estrogen; CI = confidence interval; EE = esterified estrogen; P = progestogen; RR = relative risk; TD = transdermal; ± = may have included.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Indeed, two studies49,60 provide data indicating that the highest risk may occur in the first 6 months of use (Table 2). Data from a WHI study73 show a continuing (although decreasing) trend of risk with increasing duration of use, with a hazard ratio of 1.74 in year 3 and 1.70 in year 4. Scarabin et al.58 also show a continuing significant risk (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0–6.3) at a duration of more than 4 years. The increase in risk in later years did not reach statistical significance in the studies by Daly et al.49 at 3 years, Douketis et al.59 after 4 years and Grodstein et al.72 at 5 years. 5.7 Past use of HRT A pooled analysis of four studies in a recent systematic review revealed no significant pooled VTE risk with those who had used oral estrogen HRT in the past (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.7).3 What is the role of screening for heritable thrombophilia when assessing the VTE risk
associated with HRT?
Universal screening of women for thrombophilic defects before prescribing or before continuing the
prescription of HRT is inappropriate.
There is limited information on the natural history of thrombophilias, the mechanism of estrogen- associated thrombosis and how these two factors interact. The absolute risk of VTE with HRT is, however, low. The cost-effectiveness of screening women for thrombophilia has been examined in a number of at-risk clinical circumstances74 and screening selected women before prescribing oral HRT may be the most cost-effective method. However, on the available evidence, universal screening of women for thrombophilic defects before prescribing or before continuing the prescription of HRT is inappropriate and should be discouraged.75 A number of case–control studies have examined the interaction between heritable thrombophilias and the risk of VTE with HRT. The ESTHER study examined the occurrence of a first idiopathic VTE in postmenopausal women and hospital controls (mean age 61 years).76 The vast majority of those on oral therapy at the time of the VTE event were using estradiol. For subjects carrying either the prothrombin 20210A (PT) or FVL mutation, the use of oral estradiol was associated with a 25.5-fold increased risk of VTE (95% CI 6.9–95.0, adjusted for age and body mass) compared with non- carriers not on HRT. The combination of any prothrombotic mutation and transdermal estrogen gave an odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI 2.0–9.9), results similar to those observed for women with mutations not receiving HRT. Similar results were observed for individuals carrying only the FVL mutation, with an odds ratio associated with oral estrogen use of 16.4 (95% CI 4.3–62.2) and with transdermal estrogen of 4.6 (95% CI 1.6–13.8). Smith et al. studied the impact of first post- /perimenopausal VTE associated with the PT or FVL mutations and the use of either conjugated or esterified estrogen.57 Joint exposure to conjugated estrogen and a thrombophilia mutation led to an odds ratio for VTE of 9.1 (95% CI 4.5–18.2) compared with controls with no mutation not using HRT. Perhaps owing to small numbers, a non-significant result was observed for the PT mutation alone (OR 2.4, 95% CI 0.6–9.3), although not for the FVL mutation alone (OR 14.8, 95% CI 6.7– 32.8). In this study, exposure to esterified estrogen did not result in a significant increased risk of VTE. Joint exposure to esterified estrogen and a thrombophilia also resulted in a non-significant increased VTE risk with an odds ratio of 2.1 (95% CI 0.6–6.8) and a five-fold lesser risk than the combination of thrombophilia and conjugated estrogen. In a study by Lowe et al.,77 women between 45 and 64 years of age using HRT had a significantly higher risk of VTE associated with increased APCR, low antithrombin or high factor IX levels. Extending this study, Rosendaal et al.78 observed an odds ratio of 15.5 (95% CI 3.1–76.7) in those with the FVL mutation and receiving HRT compared with those with neither exposure. A systematic review of these studies concluded that the combination of HRT and one prothrombotic mutation gives a combined odds ratio of 8.0 (95% CI 5.4–11.9) compared with women without exposure to either risk factor.3 RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists In a nested case–control study derived from two randomised clinical trials of conjugated estrogen (with or without MPA) compared with placebo in subjects with coronary heart disease,79 Herrington et al. observed that the odds ratio for VTE in those with FVL and HRT was 14.1 (95% CI 2.7–72.4) compared with those with neither FVL nor HRT. Their estimated absolute incidence of VTE was 15.4/1000 per year in those with FVL and HRT compared with 2/1000 per year in those without FVL and taking placebo. Results from the nested case–control WHI study of conjugated estrogen and MPA versus placebo73 observed that the combination of FVL and HRT resulted in an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 3.1–14.5) for VTE compared with those with neither exposure. No effect was observed for the PT mutation. From this, an estimated absolute risk of VTE with the combination of conjugated estrogen, progestogen and FVL (either as a heterozygote or a homozygote) of 8/1000 per year was calculated – half the risk seen in those with pre-existing coronary artery disease reported by Herrington.79 In a prospective study, 236 female asymptomatic carriers of the FVL mutation (with a mean age of 43 years) were identified by screening the first- degree relatives of symptomatic probands.80 Of these, 21 women used HRT for a total of 34 years, with one woman developing a deep venous thrombosis, giving an incidence of VTE related to HRT of 2.9% (95% CI 0.8%–15.3%) per year of use.
In the study by Høibraaten et al. on recurrent VTE,81 71 subjects with previous VTE were randomised to receive combination HRT with estradiol. Of the eight subjects who experienced a further VTE, three were noted to carry FVL and two had detectable anticardiolipin antibodies.
Although this gave a significant relative risk of recurrence of 2.6 (95% CI 1.3–5.4) associated with thrombophilia compared with no thrombophilia, the relative risk associated with FVL was non- significant at 1.4 (95% CI 0.4–5.3).
In women without a personal history of VTE but with a high-risk thrombophilic trait (such as deficiency
of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) that has been identified through screening because of a
symptomatic family member, oral HRT should be avoided and specialist advice sought.
Where there is no personal history of VTE but an underlying thrombophilic trait is identified through screening carried out because a first-degree relative has a history of previous VTE (e.g.
apparently spontaneous VTE, or VTE at a young age, or VTE events in two or more family members), HRT should be avoided in high-risk situations such as type 1 antithrombin deficiency or combina- tions of defects. Specialist advice should be sought. With other thrombophilic defects, there is insufficient evidence at present to indicate that HRT should be completely avoided, although, as noted above, evidence indicates around an overall eight-fold increase in risk of VTE.3 An assessment of other risk factors for VTE should be made. In the presence of multiple risk factors for VTE, HRT should be avoided. If HRT is to be used, a clear discussion of the potential excess risk should occur with the woman and transdermal therapy may be best. As this remains a controversial and rapidly developing area, advice should be sought from clinicians with special expertise in thrombophilia.
How should HRT be managed in those with a previous VTE?
A personal history of thrombosis is a contraindication to oral HRT.
If it is considered that quality of life is so severely affected that the benefits of HRT outweigh the risks,
a transdermal preparation should be used.
There is very little direct evidence on VTE risk in those with a history of prior VTE. One randomised controlled trial of 140 subjects with previous VTE,81 who were randomised to receive oral combined HRT (with 2 mg estradiol and 1 mg norethisterone or placebo), observed a 1.3-year incidence of 10.7% in those with a previous VTE (aged 42–69 years) compared with 2.3% in non- users. This equates to around a five-fold higher risk of recurrent VTE. In another randomised RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists controlled trial of oral conjugated equine estrogen and MPA compared with placebo, 141 subjects were identified as having a prior history of VTE. Of the eight cases of recurrent VTE observed, seven occurred in the treatment arm of the trial, giving a hazard ratio of 3.87 (95% CI 0.45–33.34).73 Although neither study is of sufficient size to draw definitive conclusions, both are strongly suggestive of an increased risk of VTE recurrence with oral HRT therapy in those with a previous history of VTE. Where the woman has had a previous VTE, oral HRT should usually be avoided in view of the relatively high risk of recurrence. However, women must be considered as individuals.
In each case, the woman's requirement for estrogen replacement must be defined and the potential benefits for her weighed against the risks.81 If it is considered that HRT is desirable for a particular woman, the risk of recurrence should be discussed carefully with her and she must be advised to report promptly if any symptoms compatible with VTE arise.
Where HRT is to be used in those with prior VTE, prophylactic anticoagulant therapy may be considered while the woman is taking HRT. However, if anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis has to be used, the risk of haemorrhage must be considered in the risk–benefit analysis. On standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis, major haemorrhage occurs at a rate of around 1% per year of treatment and 25% of these bleeds are fatal.82 As discussed in section 4, transdermal therapy may be best in such a situation. Specialist advice from a clinician with expertise in thrombosis and thrombophilia should be sought. Testing for thrombophilia in selected women (e.g. those with previous severe unprovoked or recurrent VTE) may be helpful in assessing the overall thrombotic risk in women with a personal history of VTE, but the result will not alter the advice that oral HRT should be avoided. In general, testing for thrombophilia in unselected women who have experienced a first episode of VTE is not routinely recommended, as there is insufficient evidence that testing reduces the risk of recurrence or that the results should influence the duration of anticoagulant therapy.75 Testing when a severe defect (such as deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) is suspected may be helpful in assessing the overall thrombotic risk. If thrombophilia testing is suggested, the limitations of testing should be discussed.
How should HRT be managed in those who develop VTE while receiving HRT?
It is recommended that, when a woman who is on HRT develops a VTE, HRT should be discontinued.
If it is considered desirable that a woman should continue HRT after a VTE has occurred on therapy, she
should be referred to a clinician with special expertise in managing women at increased thrombotic risk
As further VTE may be prevented by anticoagulation, consideration can be given to postponing the
withdrawal of HRT until the woman is due to stop anticoagulant therapy for her VTE.
As noted above, a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of oral HRT (2 mg estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone) in women with a previous confirmed VTE found that the incidence of VTE was 10.7% in the HRT group and 2.3% in the placebo group within 262 days of starting therapy.79 What other risk factors should be considered when assessing the risk of VTE associated
Before commencing HRT, any personal or family history of VTE should be assessed.
A history of VTE in a first-degree relative (i.e. parent, sibling or offspring) is a relative contraindication
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Where there is a family history in a first-degree relative, alternatives to oral HRT should be suggested.
If HRT is considered desirable, transdermal preparations are associated with a significantly lower risk
of venous thrombosis.
As VTE is usually dependent on multiple risk factors coming together, it is important to be aware of the presence of pre-existing thrombotic risk factors. The prescriber should specifically ask whether there is a previous personal history of VTE or a history of VTE in a first-degree relative.83 The presence of multiple pre-existing risk factors for VTE may suggest that HRT, itself a risk factor, might be best avoided. In particular, women with a previous VTE are at high risk of recurrence.
However, it is important to review the overall situation for each individual. Given the polygenic nature of VTE, even where a familial thrombophilia has been identified, the risk of VTE may also be increased in those members of the family who do not carry that thrombophilia.83 Consequently, a negative thrombophilia result does not necessarily exclude an increased risk. Therefore, thrombophilia testing may not be informative in predicting risk without consideration of individual risk factors and the nature of the family history. Where a heritable thrombophilia has been detected in an affected family member, testing for heritable thrombophilia will not provide a definitive estimate of risk in most cases and is not routinely recommended. However, where a high-risk heritable thrombophilia has been identified in a symptomatic family member (e.g. deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S), testing for thrombophilia may assist in the counselling of overall thrombotic risk.
HRT should be avoided in women with multiple pre-existing risk factors for VTE.
Data from the ESTHER study56 showed an increased risk of VTE associated with increasing weight.
This resulted in an odds ratio of 2.7 (95% CI 1.7–4.5) associated with being overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25 to ≤30 kg/m2) and an odds ratio of 4.0 (95% CI 2.1–7.8) associated with being obese(BMI >30 kg/m2). With exposure to (predominantly) estradiol, the risk associated with being overweight was 10.2 (95% CI 3.5–30.2) and with obesity was 20.6 (95% CI 4.8–88.1). The use of transdermal HRT did not increase the risk associated with weight. Similarly, data from the WHI study observed an increased VTE risk of 1.63 (95% CI 0.83–3.20) associated with being overweight (BMI 25–30 kg/m2) and with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) of 2.87 (95% CI 1.52–5.40). On additional exposure to esterified estrogen and MPA, the VTE risk associated with being overweight was 3.80 (95% CI 2.06 –6.94) and with obesity was 5.61 (95% CI 3.12–10.11).73 Thus, multiple defects or combinations of acquired and/or inherited risk factors are likely to be important in VTE risk. Such additional risk factors include patient factors, as detailed below.
Consequently, the increase in relative risk associated with HRT has to be viewed in the context of that associated with other risk factors and the potential for interaction between risk factors should not be underestimated.
Additional risk factors for venous thromboembolism
Increasing age Obesity (body mass index > 30) Previous VTE Post-thrombotic syndrome Varicose veins with phlebitis First-degree family history of VTE Immobility for more than 3 days Surgical procedures (anaesthesia and surgical time > 60 minutes) Other disorders, e.g. malignancy, myeloproliferative disorders, cardiac disease, paralysis of lower limbs, systemic infection, inflammatory bowel disease, nephritic syndrome, sickle cell disease RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 10. What other assessments should be considered in those presenting with VTE?
In women over 50 years of age with a history of VTE within the previous year, a full clinical history and
examination are warranted to detect underlying disease. The need for any additional investigations
should be determined by the clinical assessment.
VTE may be precipitated by an underlying malignancy or connective tissue disease, so it is important to consider such diagnoses when assessing women with recent (particularly unprovoked) VTE. With regard to undiagnosed malignancy, the nature and benefits of additional screening (beyond a standard clinical assessment) in those without clinical signs or symptoms remains controversial. In those presenting with VTE, there is some evidence that an extensive screening strategy may detect more underlying malignancy than limited screening.84 However, at present there is insufficient evidence to determine whether extensive screening strategies are either cost-effective or will have a substantial impact on the morbidity or mortality associated with the diagnosed malignancy.84 How should HRT be managed in those requiring surgery?
Each woman requires an individual assessment of the risks and benefits of stopping HRT before elective
surgery. HRT may not need to be stopped before surgery provided that appropriate thromboprophylaxis
HRT is often seen as a risk factor for postoperative thromboembolism, although there are no direct data to support such a view. Nonetheless, the combination of HRT and the changes in coagulation and the occurrence of venous stasis following surgery might combine to provide a significant increase in risk. However, this risk is likely to be small and virtually all women who receive HRT will meet the criteria for thromboprophylaxis. Both the British National Formulary85 and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence86 advise women to consider stopping HRT 4 weeks before elective surgery. However, they also acknowledge that this may not be necessary if appropriate thromboprophylaxis is used. This interpretation of the available evidence appears to be made on the basis that the effects of stopping HRT are not life threatening and that the risks may, in some women, outweigh the benefits of continuing therapy. Consequently, an individual assessment is required in each woman to balance the risks of postoperative VTE against any changes in the quality of life which may result from cessation of therapy.
12. Suggested audit topics
Evidence of counselling on the risks and benefits of HRT before prescribing HRT or when continuing HRT.
Evidence of a formal assessment of VTE risk before prescribing HRT or when continuing HRT. Inclusion of HRT use in preoperative VTE risk assessments Consideration of current/future hormone therapy use when planning the management of an acute VTE RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Carter C. The pill and thrombosis: epidemiological considera- 17. Perry W, Wiseman RA. Combined oral estradiol valerate– tions. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997;11:565–85.
norethisterone treatment over 3 years in postmenopausal Spitzer WO, Lewis MA, Heinemann LA, Thorogood M, MacRae women: effect on lipids, coagulation factors, haematology and KD. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: an international case–control study.
18. Teede HJ, McGrath BP, Smolich JJ, Malan E, Kotsopoulos D, Transnational Research Group on Oral Contraceptives and the Liang YL, et al. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy Health of Young Women. BMJ 1996;312:83¬–8.
increases coagulation activity and fibrinolysis. Arterioscler Canonico M, Plu-Bureau G, Lowe GD, Scarabin PY. Hormone Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1404–9.
replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in 19. van Baal WM, Emeis JJ, van der Mooren MJ, Kessel H, Kenemans postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis.
P, Stehouwer CD. Impaired procoagulant–anticoagulant balance during hormone replacement therapy? A randomised, placebo- Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg controlled 12-week study. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:29–34.
C, Stefanick ML, et al.; Writing Group for the Women's Health 20. Vehkavaara S, Silveira A, Hakala-Ala-Pietilä T, Virkamäki A, Hovatta Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus O, Hamsten A, et al. Effects of oral and transdermal estrogen progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results replacement therapy on markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled inflammation and serum lipids and lipoproteins in trial. JAMA 2002;288:321–33.
postmenopausal women. Thromb Haemost 2001;85:619–25.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
21. Wright D, Poller L, Thomson JM, Burrows GE, Hirst CF, Development of RCOG Green-top Guidelines: Policies and Sidebotham A. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on Processes. Clinical Governance Advice No. 1a. London: RCOG; the age-related rise of factor VIIc, and its activity state. Thromb Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Develop- 22. Scarabin PY, Vissac AM, Kirzin JM, Bourgeat P, Amiral J, Agher R, ment of RCOG Green-top Guidelines: Producing a Scope.
et al. Population correlates of coagulation factor VII.
Clinical Governance Advice No. 1b. London: RCOG; 2006 Importance of age, sex, and menopausal status as determinants of activated factor VII. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:1170–6. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
23. Lindoff C, Peterson F, Lecander I, Martinsson G, Astedt B. Trans- Development of RCOG Green-top Guidelines: Producing a dermal estrogen replacement therapy: beneficial effects on Clinical Practice Guideline. Clinical Governance Advice No.
hemostatic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Maturitas 1c. London: RCOG; 2006 [http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens- 24. Kroon U, Silfverstolpe G, Tengborn L. The effects of transdermal estradiol and oral conjugated estrogens on haemostasis Lowe GD, Rumley A, Woodward M, Morrison CE, Philippou H, variables. Thromb Haemost 1994;71:420–3.
Lane DA, et al. Epidemiology of coagulation factors, inhibitors 25. Randomised comparison of oestrogen versus oestrogen plus and activation markers: the Third Glasgow MONICA Survey. I.
progestogen hormone replacement therapy in women with Illustrative reference ranges by age, sex and hormone use. Br J hysterectomy. Medical Research Council's General Practice Research Framework. BMJ 1996;312:473–8.
Meade TW, Dyer S, Howarth DJ, Imeson JD, Stirling Y. Anti- 26. Post MS, Christella M, Thomassen LG, van der Mooren MJ, van thrombin III and procoagulant activity: sex differences and Baal WM, Rosing J, et al. Effect of oral and transdermal estrogen effects of the menopause. Br J Haematol 1990;74:77–81.
replacement therapy on hemostatic variables associated with 10. Tait RC, Walker ID, Islam SI, McCall F, Conkie JA, Mitchell R, et al.
venous thrombosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study in Influence of demographic factors on antithrombin III activity in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol a healthy population. Br J Haematol 1993;84:467–80.
11. Tait RC, Walker ID, Islam SI, McCall F, Conkie JA, Wight M, et al.
27. Koh KK, Shin MS, Sakuma I, Ahn JY, Jin DK, Kim HS, et al.
Protein C activity in healthy volunteers – influence of age, sex, Effects of conventional or lower doses of hormone replace- smoking and oral contraceptives. Thromb Haemost ment therapy in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:1516–21.
12. Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Ormiston TM, Greyber E, Buckley NS, 28. Borgfeldt C, Li CH, Samsioe G. Low-dose oral combination of 17 Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: effect of hormone-replacement beta-estradiol and norethisterone acetate in postmenopausal therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in post- women decreases factor VII, fibrinogen, antithrombin and menopausal women. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8:538–54.
plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Climacteric 2004;7:78–85.
13. Braunstein JB, Kershner DW, Bray P, Gerstenblith G, Schulman 29. Perera M, Sattar N, Petrie JR, Hillier C, Small M, Connell JM, et al.
SP, Post WS, et al. Interaction of hemostatic genetics with The effects of transdermal estradiol in combination with oral hormone therapy: new insights to explain arterial thrombosis norethisterone on lipoproteins, coagulation and endothelial in postmenopausal women. Chest 2002;121:906–20.
markers in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes: a 14. Cushman M, Psaty BM, Meilahn EN, Dobs AS, Kuller LH. Post- randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol menopausal hormone therapy and concentrations of protein C and antithrombin in elderly women. Br J Haematol 30. Clark P, Walker ID. The phenomenon known as acquired activated protein C resistance. Br J Haematol 2001;115:767–73.
15. Hoibraaten E, Os I, Seljeflot I, Andersen TO, Hofstad A, Sandset 31. Clark P, Walker ID, Greer I. Acquired activated protein-C PM. The effects of hormone replacement therapy on hemo- resistance in pregnancy and association with increased static variables in women with angiographically verified thrombin generation and fetal weight. Lancet 1999;353:292–3.
coronary artery disease: results from the estrogen in women 32. Oger E, Alhenc-Gelas M, Lacut K, Blouch MT, Roudaut N, Kerlan with atherosclerosis study. Thromb Res 2000;98:19–27.
V, et al. Differential effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/ 16. Luyer MD, Khosla S, Owen WG, Miller VM. Prospective progesterone regimens on sensitivity to activated protein C randomized study of effects of unopposed estrogen replace- among postmenopausal women: a randomized trial.
ment therapy on markers of coagulation and inflammation in Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:1671–6.
postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 33. Post MS, Rosing J, Van Der Mooren MJ, Zweegman S, Van Baal WM, Kenemans P, et al.; Ageing Women' and the Institute for RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Cardiovascular Research–Vrije Universiteit (ICaR-VU) Increased 52. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart resistance to activated protein C after short-term oral hormone disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The replacement therapy in healthy post-menopausal women. Br J Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial.
The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. JAMA 1995;273:199–208.
34. Høibraaten E, Mowinckel MC, de Ronde H, Bertina RM, Sandset Erratum in: JAMA 1995;274:1676 PM. Hormone replacement therapy and acquired resistance to 53. Naess IA, Christiansen SC, Romundstad P, Cannegieter SC, activated protein C: results of a randomized, double-blind, Rosendaal FR, Hammerstrøm J. Incidence and mortality of placebo-controlled trial. Br J Haematol 2001;115:415–20.
venous thrombosis: a population-based study. J Thromb 35. Sidelmann JJ, Jespersen J, Andersen LF, Skouby SO; Prospective Collaborative Danish Climacteric Study. Hormone replacement 54. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, therapy and hypercoagulability. Results from the Prospective Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A population-based Collaborative Danish Climacteric Study. BJOG 2003;110:541–7.
perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of 36. Cosman F, Baz-Hecht M, Cushman M, Vardy MD, Cruz JD, Nieves deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester JW, et al. Short-term effects of estrogen, tamoxifen and DVT study. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:933–8.
raloxifene on hemostasis: a randomized-controlled study and 55. Nordström M, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, Kjellström T. A prospec- review of the literature. Thromb Res 2005;116:1–13.
tive study of the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis within a 37. Gottsäter A, Rendell M, Hulthén UL, Berntorp E, Mattiasson I.
defined urban population. J Intern Med 1992;232:155–60.
Hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal 56. Canonico M, Oger E, Conard J, Meyer G, Lévesque H, Trillot N, women: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of effects on et al.; EStrogen and THromboEmbolism Risk (ESTHER) Study coagulation and fibrinolytic factors. J Intern Med Group. Obesity and risk of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: differential impact of hormone 38. Hahn L, Mattsson LA, Andersson B, Tengborn L. The effects of therapy by route of estrogen administration. The ESTHER oestrogen replacement therapy on haemostatic variables in Study. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:1259–65.
postmenopausal women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes 57. Smith NL, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Reiner AP, Lumley T, mellitus. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1999;10:81–6.
Rosendaal FR, et al. Conjugated equine estrogen, esterified 39. Douketis JD, Gordon M, Johnston M, Julian JA, Adachi JR, estrogen, prothrombotic variants, and the risk of venous Ginsberg JS. The effects of hormone replacement therapy on thrombosis in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb thrombin generation, fibrinolysis inhibition, and resistance to Vasc Biol 2006;26:2807–12.
activated protein C: prospective cohort study and review of 58. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G; EStrogen and literature. Thromb Res 2000;99:25–34.
THromboEmbolism Risk Study Group. Differential association 40. Lowe GD, Rumley A, Woodward M, Reid E, Rumley J. Activated of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with protein C resistance and the FV:R506Q mutation in a random venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet 2003;362:428–32.
population sample. Thromb Res 1999;81:918–24.
59. Douketis JD, Julian JA, Kearon C, Anderson DR, Crowther MA, 41. Lowe GD, Upton MN, Rumley A, McConnachie A, O'Reilly DS, Bates SM, et al. Does the type of hormone replacement therapy Watt GC. Different effects of oral and transdermal hormone influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A prospective replacement therapies on factor IX, APC resistance, t-PA, PAI case–control study. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:943–8.
and C-reactive protein – a cross-sectional population survey.
60. Pérez Gutthann S, García Rodríguez LA, Castellsague J, Duque Thromb Haemost 2001;86:550–6.
Oliart A. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous 42. Folsom AR, Lutsey PL, Astor BC, Cushman M. C-reactive protein thromboembolism: population based case–control study. BMJ and venous thromboembolism. A prospective investigation in the ARIC cohort. Thromb Haemost 2009;102:615–9. 61. Varas-Lorenzo C, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Cattaruzzi C, Troncon 43. Störk S, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Bots ML. Estrogen, MG, Agostinis L, Perez-Gutthann S. Hormone replacement inflammation and cardiovascular risk in women: a critical therapy and the risk of hospitalization for venous thrombo- appraisal. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004;15:66–72.
embolism: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 44. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Rifai N, Buring JE, Manson JE.
Hormone replacement therapy and increased plasma concen- 62. Canonico M, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G, Conard J, Meyer G, tration of C-reactive protein. Circulation 1999;100:713–6.
Lévesque H, et al.; Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk 45. Rossi R, Bursi F, Veronesi B, Caqnacci A, Modena MG. Effects of (ESTHER) Study Group. Hormone therapy and venous thrombo- progestins on estrogen-induced increase in C-reactive protein embolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2004;49:315–20.
of estrogen administration and progestogens: the ESTHER Study.
46. Duvernoy C. Estrogen and C-reactive protein: does an alternate route lead to a more attractive destination? Thromb Haemost 63. Smith NL, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Reiner AP, Lumley T, Weiss NS, et al. Esterified estrogens and conjugated equine estrogens 47. Tannen RL, Weiner MG, Xie D, Barnhardt K. A simulation using and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 2004;292:1581–7.
data from a primary care practice database closely replicated 64. Cole JA, Norman H, Doherty M, Walker AM. Venous thrombo- the women's health initiative trial. J Clin Epidemiol embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke among trans- dermal contraceptive system users. Obstet Gynecol 48. Prentice RL, Manson JE, Langer RD, Anderson GL, Pettinger M, Jackson RD, et al. Benefits and risks of postmenopausal 65. Vickers MR, MacLennan AH, Lawton B, Ford D, Martin J, hormone therapy when it is initiated soon after menopause.
Meredith SK, et al.; WISDOM group. Main morbidities recorded Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:12–23.
in the women's international study of long duration oestrogen 49. Daly E, Vessey MP, Painter R, Hawkins MM. Case–control study after menopause (WISDOM): a randomised controlled trial of of venous thromboembolism risk in users of hormone hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.
replacement therapy. Lancet 1996;348:1027.
50. Jick H, Derby LE, Myers MW, Vasilakis C, Newton KM. Risk of 66. Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, Carr JJ, Langer RD, Hsia J, hospital admission for idiopathic venous thromboembolism et al.; WHI and WHI-CACS Investigators. Estrogen therapy and among users of postmenopausal oestrogens. Lancet coronary-artery calcification. N Engl J Med 51. Jick H, Jick SS, Gurewich V, Myers MW, Vasilakis C. Risk of 67. Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE, Wu L, Barad D, Barnabei idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous VM, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with cardiovascular disease by age and years since menopause.
differing progestagen components. Lancet 1995;346:1589–93.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 68. Renoux C, Dell'aniello S, Garbe E, Suissa S. Transdermal and oral 79. Herrington DM, Vittinghoff E, Howard TD, Major DA, Owen J, hormone replacement therapy and the risk of stroke: a nested Reboussin D, et al. Factor V Leiden, hormone replacement case–control study. BMJ 2010;340:c2519.
therapy, and risk of venous thromboembolic events in women 69. Stevenson JC, Hodis HN, Pickar JH, Lobo RA. Coronary heart with coronary disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol disease and menopause management: the swinging pendulum of HRT. Atherosclerosis 2009;207:336–40.
80. Middeldorp S, Meinardi JR, Koopman MM, van Pampus EC, 70. Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Hamulyák K, van der Meer J, et al. A prospective study of Black H, et al.; Women's Health Initiative Steering Committee.
asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation to Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism. Ann women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative Intern Med 2001;135:322–7.
randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1701–12.
81. Høibratten E, Qvigstad E, Arnesen H, Larsen S, Wickstrøm E, 71. Tannen RL, Weiner MG, Xie D, Barnhart K. Estrogen affects post- Sandset PM. Increased risk of recurrent venous thrombo- menopausal women differently than estrogen plus progestin embolism during hormone replacement therapy – results of replacement therapy. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1769–77.
the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled estrogen in 72. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Goldhaber SZ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, venous thromboembolism trial (EVTET). Thromb Haemost Speizer FE, et al. Prospective study of exogenous hormones and risk of pulmonary embolism in women. Lancet 82. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, Poggi M, Manotti C, D'Angelo A, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: 73. Cushman M, Kuller LH, Prentice R, Rodabough RJ, Psaty BM, an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT).
Stafford RS, et al.; Women's Health Initiative Investigators.
Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.
Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 83. Bezemer ID, van der Meer FJ, Eikenboom JC, Rosendaal FR, 74. Wu O, Robertson L, Twaddle S, Lowe G, Clark P, Walker I, et al.; Doggen CJ. The value of family history as a risk indicator for Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:610–5.
Screening (TREATS) Study. Screening for thrombophilia in 84. Carrier M, Le Gal G, Wells PS, Ferguson D, Ramsay T, Rodger M.
high-risk situations: a meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness Systematic review: the Trousseau syndrome revisited: should analysis. Br J Haematol 2005;131:80–90.
we screen extensively for cancer in patients with venous 75. Baglin T, Gray E, Greaves M, Hunt B, Keeling D, Machin S, et al.; thromboembolism? Ann Intern Med 2008;149:323–33.
British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Clinical 85. British National Formulary. London: British Medical guidelines for testing for heritable thrombophilia. Br J Association, Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2008. Haematol 2010;149:209–220. 86. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Venous 76. Straczek C, Oger E, Yon de Jomage-Canonico MB, Plu-Bureau G, thromboembolism: reducing the risk. Reducing the risk of Conard J, Meyer G, et al.; Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and (ESTHER) Study Group. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to hospital. NICE therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmeno- clinical guideline 92. London: NICE; 2010 [http:// pausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration.
87. Høibraaten E, Abdelnoor M, Sandset PM. Hormone replacement 77. Lowe G, Woodward M, Vessey M, Rumley A, Gough P, Daly E.
therapy with estradiol and risk of venous thromboembolism – Thrombotic variables and risk of idiopathic venous a population-based case–control study. Thromb Haemost thromboembolism in women aged 45–64 years. Relationships to hormone replacement therapy. Thromb Haemost2000;83:530–5.
78. Rosendaal FR, Vessey M, Rumley A, Daly E, Woodward M, Helmerhorst FM, et al. Hormonal replacement therapy,prothrombotic mutations and the risk of venous thrombosis.
Br J Haematol 2002;116:851–4.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists APPENDIX
Clinical guidelines are ‘systematically developed statements which assist clinicians and women in making decisions about appropriate treatment for specific conditions'. Each guideline is systematically developed using a standardised methodology. Exact details of this process can be found in Clinical Governance Advice No.1: Development of RCOG Green-top Guidelines (available on the RCOG website at
http://www.rcog.org.uk/guidelines). These recommendations are not intended to dictate an exclusive
course of management or treatment. They must be evaluated with reference to individual patient needs,
resources and limitations unique to the institution and variations in local populations. It is hoped that this process of local ownership will help to incorporate these guidelines into routine practice. Attention is drawn to areas of clinical uncertainty where further research might be indicated.
The evidence used in this guideline was graded using the scheme below and the recommendations formulated in a similar fashion with a standardised grading scheme.
Classification of evidence levels
Grades of recommendations
1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic At least one meta-analysis, systematic review or reviews of randomised controlled trials randomised controlled trial rated as 1++ and or randomised controlled trials with a directly applicable to the target population; or very low risk of bias A systematic review of randomised controlled Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic trials or a body of evidence consisting reviews of randomised controlled trials principally of studies rated as 1+ directly or randomised controlled trials with a applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of A body of evidence including studies rated as randomised controlled trials or 2++ directly applicable to the target randomised controlled trials with a high population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or 2++ High-quality systematic reviews of Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as case–control or cohort studies or high- quality case–control or cohort studies A body of evidence including studies rated as with a very low risk of confounding, bias 2+ directly applicable to the target population or chance and a high probability that the and demonstrating overall consistency of relationship is causal Well-conducted case–control or cohort Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as studies with a low risk of confounding, bias or chance and a moderateprobability that the relationship is causal Evidence level 3 or 4; or Case–control or cohort studies with a Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+ high risk of confounding, bias or chanceand a significant risk that therelationship is not causal Good practice point
Non-analytical studies, e.g. case reports, Recommended best practice based on the P clinical experience of the guideline development group RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists This guideline was produced on behalf of the Guidelines Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and
Professor IA Greer FRCOG, Liverpool, Professor ID Walker, Department of Haematology, University of
Glasgow and Dr P Clark, Consultant Haematologist and Honorary Reader, Scottish National Blood
Transfusion Service, Dundee
and peer reviewed by:British Menopause Society; Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; RCOG Consumers' Forum; Royal Collegeof Midwives; Mr DI Fraser MRCOG, Norfolk; Mr DW Sturdee FRCOG, Solihull; Ms MCP Rees FRCOG, Oxford; ProfessorPC Hannaford, Aberdeen, Scotland; Professor M Greaves, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Committee lead reviewers were: Mrs CE Overton FRCOG, Bristol and Mr P Owen, MRCOG, Glasgow, Scotland.
Conflicts of interest: none declared.
The final version is the responsibility of the Guidelines Committee of the RCOG.
The guideline review process will commence in 2014 unless evidence requires earlier review.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists produces guidelines as an educational aid to good clinicalpractice. They present recognised methods and techniques of clinical practice, based on published evidence, forconsideration by obstetricians and gynaecologists and other relevant health professionals. The ultimate judgementregarding a particular clinical procedure or treatment plan must be made by the doctor or other attendant in the lightof clinical data presented by the patient and the diagnostic and treatment options available within the appropriatehealth services. This means that RCOG Guidelines are unlike protocols or guidelines issued by employers, as they are not intended tobe prescriptive directions defining a single course of management. Departure from the local prescriptive protocols orguidelines should be fully documented in the patient's case notes at the time the relevant decision is taken.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 19 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Microsoft word - screening neonatale. cart audiologia
La sordità infantile: lo screening uditivo neonatale universa- le, il percorso del paziente ipoacusico in età pediatrica. Alessandro Martinia, Paola Marchisiob, Luciano Bubbicoc, Patrizia Trevisia, Lodovico Perlettid a Dip. Neuroscienze e Organi di Senso – UOC Otochirurgia e Cattedra di Audiologia, Uni- versità di Padova b Professore Associato di Pediatria, Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico,
Eur J Clin PharmacolDOI 10.1007/s00228-015-1896-x CYP2B6 rs2279343 polymorphism is associated with smokingcessation success in bupropion therapy Paulo Roberto Xavier Tomaz1 & Juliana Rocha Santos1 & Jaqueline Scholz Issa2 &Tânia Ogawa Abe 2 & Patrícia Viviane Gaya2 & José Eduardo Krieger1 &Alexandre Costa Pereira1,3 & Paulo Caleb Júnior Lima Santos1,3 Received: 21 April 2015 / Accepted: 26 June 2015