In second place among basic reasons for erectile dysfunction in Australia are different ailments cialis australia which may not necessarily be connected to the sexual sphere.
Microsoft word - galanterkrishnan25.docGalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM "Bread for the Poor": Access to Justice and the Rights of the Needy in India† Marc Galanter* & Jayanth K. Krishnan** India is rightly acclaimed for achieving a flourishing constitutional order, presided over by an inventive and activist judiciary, aided by a proficient bar, supported by the state and cherished by the public. At the same time, the courts and tribunals where ordinary Indians might go for remedy and protection are beset with massive problems of delay, cost, and ineffectiveness. Potential users avoid the courts; in spite of a long-standing reputation for litigiousness, existing evidence suggests that Indi-ans avail themselves of the courts at a low rate and the rate seems to be falling.1 Still, the courts remain gridlocked.2 There is wide agreement that † Parts I and II of this Article consist of a modified excerpt from Marc Galanter & Jayanth K. Krishnan, Debased Informalism: Lok Adalats and Legal Rights in Modern India, in Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law, at 104–16 (Erik G. Jensen & Thomas C. Heller eds., 2003). * Centennial Professor of Law, The London School of Economics and the John and Rylla Bosshard Professor of Law and South Asian Studies, The University of Wisconsin-Madison. ** Assistant Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law. For their insights and com- ments, the authors thank Upendra Baxi, Rajeev Dhavan, Ken Gallant, Erik Jensen, Julia Eckert, Mi-chael Anderson, Keith Mackiggan, Sally Merry, and Clark Cunningham. The authors also express gratitude to Ranbir Singh and Ghanshyam Singh as well as to the Department for International De-velopment (United Kingdom), which provided funding for this research. 1. While reliable data are scarce and the state of record keeping makes collecting them a daunt- ing task, there are some bits to suggest that India is among the lowest in the world in per capita use of civil courts. Some years back, Professor Christian Wollschläger presented a comparison of the per cap-ita rate of filing of civil cases in some thirty-five jurisdictions for the ten year period between 1987–1996. Annual rates of filing in courts of first instance per 1000 persons ranged from 123 in Germany and 111 in Sweden at the high end to 2.6 in Nepal and 1.7 in Ethiopia at the bottom. Since no national figures are available for India, Professor Wollschläger included in his comparison figures on Ma-harashtra, one of India's most industrialized states, whose capital (Mumbai or Bombay) is India's fi-nancial center. Maharashtra ranked thirty-second of the thirty-five jurisdictions with an annual per capita rate of 3.5 filings per 1000 persons. Of course, it is true that Wollschläger looked only at a single state and one ten-year period, and there is a question as to how representative his finding is for India overall. But there is no reason to think that Maharashtra has less litigation than India as a whole, since the data point to a general correlation of court use with economic development. See Christian Woll-schläger, Exploring Global Landscapes of Litigation Rates, in Soziologie des Rechts: Festschrift Für Erhard Blankenburg Zum 60. Geburtstag (Jürgen Brand & Dieter Strempel eds., 1998). Also a recent Asian Development Bank comparison of legal institutions in six Asian nations offers rough GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. access to justice in India requires reforms that would enable ordinary people to invoke the remedies and protections of the law. In this study we focus on an innovative forum, introduced just twenty years ago, which has enjoyed substantial governmental and judicial support and is en-dorsed and promoted, indeed given pride of place by influential elites, as a promising avenue of access to justice. This forum is the lok adalat, lit-erally "people's court," and as the name suggests it is promoted as having a different source and character than the courts of the state. In fact, the lok adalat is a creature of the state, but because of the pretension that it is not, it deserves examination under the rubric of an alternative, non- confirmation both of the absolute level of court use in India and its low comparative rank. Comparing India with China, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia and Japan, the ADB study finds that in India, the rate of filing cases in the lower civil courts was 1209 per million [1.2 per thousand] population in 1995. This is about one-third as many cases as Wollschläger found, which probably reflects the differences between Maharashtra and India as a whole as well as in the acuity of the researchers. The Indian rate is only slightly higher than the Chinese, but the Chinese figure includes only commercial cases. And the In-dian rate is far lower than that of the other countries in the comparison. Malaysia, the country whose legal institutions most resemble those of India had a civil litigation rate in 1990 of 17,850 cases per mil-lion [17.8 per thousand] population—roughly fifteen times that of India. India's placement at the bot-tom of this list is especially remarkable if we recall that Japan (3,386.8 civil cases per million [3.4 per thousand of a population containing a much higher proportion of adults]) and Korea (14,713 civil cases per million [14.7 per thousand], excluding family cases) are famously "unlitigious" societies. Obviously, these comparisons are far from exact but as rough as they are they put into question the notion that the Indian courts are victims of an excessively litigious population. See Katharina Pistor & Philip A. Wellons et al., The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian Economic Development 1960–1995, 246 tbl. 7.18 (1999). Also consider Robert Moog's work, which has examined litigation rates in Uttar Pradesh (UP) from 1951 to 1976. (In 1976 the state stopped issuing these statistics.) He found that per capita civil filings in all district level courts in UP had fallen dramatically from the early days of Independence, when there were 1.63 per thousand persons in 1951, to 1976 when there were only 0.88 per thousand. See Robert Moog, Indian Litigiousness and the Litigation Explosion, 33 Asian Surv. 1136, 1138–39 tbl. 1 (1993). Going back even further, Oliver Mendelsohn observes that "[t]here is now less litigation in absolute terms than there was in the nineteenth century or first half of the . . [twentieth] century and, therefore, far less relative to population." See Oliver Mendelsohn, The Pathology of the Indian Legal System, 15 Modern Asian Stud. 823, 849 (1981). The continuation of this downward trend receives some confirmation from the ADB study which reports that in "1960 [there were] 610.4 court cases in civil matters per million people [0.6 per thousand] . . but in 1995 there were only 507.9 [0.5 per thousand] civil cases." This discussion as well as much of the subsequent discussion on the Indian legal system in parts one and two of the main text draw from a much longer study conducted by the authors. See generally Galanter & Krishnan, supra note †, at 96. What is presented in Parts I and II below is a modified ex-cerpt from that article. For the full, twenty thousand-plus word historical discussion consult the article, although note, in that study the authors had not yet collected the original empirical data that are at the heart of this Article and will be presented in Parts III and IV. 2. The courts appear to be heavily used because there are relatively few courts in India. Most common law countries tend to have fewer judges than civil law countries. Consider the table in appen-dix A. Data we have collected suggests that India has only one-tenth to one-sixth the number of judges per capita that are found in the developed parts of the common law world. See also Bibek Debroy, Losing a World Record, Far Eastern Econ. Rev., Feb. 14, 2002, at 23 (noting that there are "23 mil-lion pending court cases—20,000 in the Supreme Court, 3.2 million in the High Courts and 20 million in lower or subordinate courts"). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR state justice system. We suspect that a number of the inhabitants of that category bear a similar ambivalent relationship to the state. This Article will proceed in the following manner: Part I recounts the post-Independence movement to establish village-based courts as a key method of enlarging public access to justice. After discussing the set-backs this movement encountered, we contrast the top-down "public in-terest litigation" approach that emerged in the wake of the Emergency period (1975–1977). In Part II we focus on how, beginning in the 1980s, judges and politicians returned to the captivating idea of settling disputes in an indigenous, traditional manner at the grassroots level. During this time, the concept of the Lok Adalat started gaining significant momen-tum, and we discuss the reasons why so many supported expanding this alternative dispute institution throughout India. In Part III we present findings from our preliminary observations of several different types of Lok Adalats. We conclude that the claim that this forum offers partici-pants speedy, fair, deliberative justice needs serious reconsideration. I. Earlier "Access to Justice" Initiatives A. NYAYA PANCHAYATS: A Failed Attempt to Reconstitute Justice along ‘Indigenous' Lines The Lok Adalat movement is a recent arrival on the "Access to Jus- tice" scene. A movement to restore an indigenous legal system flourished briefly in the years just after Indian Independence.3 Gandhians and so-cialists within the ruling Indian National Congress viewed the legal sys-tem inherited from the British as unsuitable to a reconstructed India, in which faction and conflict bred by colonial oppression would be replaced by harmony and conciliation. They proposed the displacement of modern courts by restored traditional panchayats—a proposal that met with the nearly unanimous disdain of lawyers and judges and the vitriolic scorn of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, chair of the Constitution's Drafting Committee, who sidetracked the push for panchayats into a non-justiciable Directive Principle.4 As part of the Panchayati Raj [local self-government] policy of Galanter, The Aborted Restoration of ‘Indigenous' Law in India, in Law and Society in Modern India 38–39 (Rajeer Dhavan ed., 1989) [hereinafter Galanter, Aborted Restoration]. 4. Id. at 40 n.16. Article 40 states that: "The State shall takes steps to organize village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government." For a classic work on the appeal of "traditional" institutions, see Lloyd I. Rudolph & Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India (1967). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. the late 1950s, judicial, or nyaya, panchayats were established with juris-diction over specific categories of petty cases.5 Although these nyaya panchayats derived sentimental and symbolic support from appeal to the virtues of the indigenous system, they were quite different from traditional panchayats. They applied statutory law rather than indigenous norms; they made decisions by majority rule rather than unanimity; their membership was chosen by popular election from territorial constituencies rather than consisting of the leading men of a caste.6 Indeed the focus on the "village" panchayat represented an attempt to recreate an idealized version of traditional society that em-phasized democratic fellowship and ignored the caste basis of that society and its justice institutions.7 Like their traditional counterparts, these official nyaya panchayats encountered severe problems of establishing their independence of per-sonal ties with the parties, enforcing their decrees, and acting expedi-tiously.8 They never attracted significant support from the villagers in whose name they were established. Their caseloads declined steadily while those of the courts continued to rise. In Uttar Pradesh, civil filings in the nyaya panchayats fell from 82,321 in 1960 to 22,912 in 1970—just over four cases per nyaya panchayat.9 During the same period, civil fil-ings in the Subordinate Courts rose from 74,958 to 86,749.10 One indica-tor of their demise is found in the experience of a researcher in Uttar Pradesh in the 1970s, frustrated by the rarity of nyaya panchayat sessions, 5. Upendra Baxi & Marc Galanter, Panchayat Justice: An Indian Experiment in Legal Access, in 3 Access To Justice: Emerging Issues and Perspectives (Mauro Cappelletti & Bryant Garth eds., 1978); See also Dr. R. Kushawaha, Working of Nyaya Panchayats in India: a Case Study of Va-ranasi District Dr. L.M. Singhri ed., (1977). 6. Kushawaha, supra note 5, at 31–63. 7. Reviewing the literature on panchayats, Robert Hayden concludes that there was no such thing as a "village" panchayat, but only caste panchayats that, if sufficiently powerful locally, might decide matters involving members of other castes as well. See Robert Hayden, Disputes and Argu-ments Amongst Nomads 83–109 (1999). See also, Louis Dumont, Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications 170–172 (1970) (noting that "we conclude that on the eve of British con-quest, and excepting exceptional cases, there was no village panchayat as a permanent institution dis-tinct from caste panchayats. There was a panchayat of the dominant caste of the village, and there were meetings of ad hoc arbitrators or judges, of a temporary nature."). 8. Catherine S. Meschievitz & Marc Galanter, In Search of Nyaya Panchayats: The Politics of a Moribund Institution, in 2 The Politics of Informal Justice: Comparative Studies 47–77 (Richard L. Abel, ed., 1982). 9. Baxi & Galanter, supra note 5, at 369 tbl. 1. 10. Id. at 371 tbl. 2. See also Kushawaha, supra note 5, at 99 (noting that in his study of Varansi district in Uttar Pradesh, "during the eleven years (1960–70) only 10449 cases were instituted before 289 Nyaya Panchayat in the whole of the district. This works out at an average of 4 cases per Nyaya Panchayat per year."). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR whose villager hosts graciously offered to convene one to facilitate her research.11 In little more than a decade, nyaya panchayats were moribund.12 It is not clear whether they withered away because they lacked the qualities of the traditional indigenous tribunals or because they displayed them all too well. We believe that it was most likely because they represented an unappetizing combination of the formality of official law with the politi-cal malleability of village tribunals. As Catherine Meschievitz summed it up, "the N[yaya] P[anchayat] is thus a body of men . . that handles dis-putes without regard to applicable rules and yet appears to villagers as formal and incomprehensible."13 Nevertheless, the panchayat idea continued to exert a powerful at- traction on legal intellectuals.14 The 1973 report of the Expert Committee on Legal Aid, chaired by (and consisting of) Justice Krishna Iyer, a re-port that viewed itself as a radical critique of Indian legal arrangements, speaks glowingly of nyaya panchayats as part of a larger scheme of legal aid and access to the courts.15 Panchayats are endorsed as a method of in-corporating lay participation into the administration of justice.16 But it is clear that the justice in mind is "legal justice," the law of the land, and not that of the villagers or their spiritual advisors.17 Panchayats are com-mended as inexpensive, accessible, expeditious and suitable to preside over conciliatory proceedings.18 The panches envisioned by the report are not village notables but superannuated judges and retired advocates. 11. Meschievitz & Galanter, supra note 8, at 55. 12. Id. at 68–70. 13. Id. at 66. For a recent study that reviews how Nyaya Panchayats functioned in the years fol- lowing Independence in Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka, see S.N. Mathur, Nyaya Pancha-yats as Instruments of Justice 43–77 (1997) (concluding that although Nyaya Panchayats had moments of promise, and at times even brought important legal services to those at the local levels, ultimately they were plagued by inconsistent rulings, inept administrators, a weak infrastructure, de-lay, and a lack of full accountability to the public). 14. The attraction long antedates independent India. For an account of the love affair of reform- ers with panchayats, see Catherine S. Meschievitz, Panchayat Justice: State-Sponsored Informal Courts in 19th and 20th Century India 18–21, (Disputes Processing Research Program, Institute for Legal Studies, Univeristy of Wisconsin Madison Law School, Working Paper 8:1, 1987). 15. Report of The Expert Committee on Legal Aid—Processual Justice to the People, Gov- ernment of India, Ministry of law, Justice & Company Affairs, Department of Legal Affiars, 1973 [hereinafter Report of the Expert Committee].
16. Id. at 137–45; see also D.A. Desai, Alternat ive Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Role of Legal Profession, Dispute Commissions and Family Courts and Nyaya Panchayats—Participatory Justice, in Role of Law and Judiciary in Transformation of Society: India-Gdr Experiments 80 (D.A. Desai ed., 1984) (commenting that "Nyaya Panchayats offer a forum for participatory justice. Local village groups fully aware of local problems, local solutions and local environment would tend to resolve the dispute in the spirit of give and take, fairplay and equity."). 17. Report of the Expert Committee, supra note 15, at 145. 18. Id. at 139. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. The follow-up report of the Bhagwati Committee, charged with pro- posing concrete measures to secure access to justice for the poor, en-dorses a system of "law and justice at the panchayat level with a conciliatory methodology."19 The argument was that panchayats would remove many of the defects of the British system of administration of justice, since they would be manned by people with knowledge of local customs and habits, attitudes and values, familiar with the ways of living and thought of the parties before them.20 Yet again the proposed panchayats do not depart from established notions of law. There was to be a presiding judge having knowledge of law, and the lay members were to receive rudimentary legal training.21 There would be no lawyers and the tribunal would proceed informally, its decisions subject to review by the district court.22 What is proposed is an informal, conciliatory, non-adversarial small claims court with some lay participation. This follow-up report—written by distinguished activist judges dedicated to enlarging access to justice—thus registered the appeal of the locally based "indige-nous" forum under the guidance of an educated and beneficent outsider. The catalyst in the formation of the lok adalat template was an in- fluential 1976 article by Upendra Baxi, then India's most prominent legal academic, well connected to activist circles within the judiciary. Baxi de-scribed a "Lok Adalat" run by Harivallabh Parikh, a charismatic Gan-dhian social worker in a tribal area of Gujarat.23 This forum was independent of the official law, both institutionally and normatively, al-though it bore no evident connection to traditional tribal institutions. As in the Krishna Iyer and Bhagwati reports, the imagery of indigenous jus-tice was combined with celebration of conciliation and local responsive-ness under the leadership of an educated outsider. These visions of paternalistic indigenous justice, published during the 1975–1977 Emer-gency, provided the basis for future developments. The end of Emer-gency Rule and the return to democracy in 1977 brought great ferment in the Indian legal world and inspired hope that institutions and organiza-tions could be fashioned to protect the rights of the powerless.24 19. See P.N. Bhagwati, Report on National Juridicare: Equal Justice-Social Justice 33–34 (Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, 1976).
20. Id. at 34–40. 21. Id. at 36–41. 22. Id. at 39. 23. Upendra Baxi, From Takrar to Karar: The Lok Adalat at Rangpur—A Preliminary Study, 10 J. of Const. and Parliamentary Stud. 52 (1976). Baxi reports that the term "Lok Adalat" was used by participants in Rangpur (correspondence with Baxi, Mar. 13, 2002). His article may well be the source of its wider and official use.
24. See generally Upendra B axi, Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Su- preme Court of India, in Judges and the Judicial Power 289 (Rajeev Dhavan et al. eds., 1985); Smitu Kothari, Social Movements and the Redefinition of Democracy, in India Briefing, 141–51 (Philip GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR B. Public Interest Litigation: ‘Access' through the Top In the early 1980s a small number of judges and lawyers, seeking ways to actualize the Constitution's promises of justice—promises that were so starkly unrealized in practice—embarked on a series of unprece-dented and electrifying initiatives. These included relaxation of require-ments of standing, appointment of investigative commissions, appointment of lawyers as representatives of client groups, and a so-called "epistolary jurisdiction" in which judges took the initiative to re-spond proactively to grievances brought to their attention by third par-ties, letters, or newspaper accounts.25 Public interest litigation, or social action litigation, as these initiatives are now called, sought to use judicial power to protect excluded and powerless groups (such as prisoners, mi-grant laborers, and the environmentally susceptible) and to secure enti-tlements that were going unredeemed.26 At the same time the government and the bar moved to implement the long-standing commitment to legal aid.27 A body was established, un- Oldenburg ed., 1993) (noting that following the Emergency there was an enthusiasm among civil rights and public interest organizations that democracy could be ensured by the rule of law). 25. See Carl Baar, Social Action Litigation in India: The Operation and Limitations of the World's Most Active Judiciary, 19 Pol'y Stud. J. 140, 142, 147 (1990). P.N. Bhagwati, Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation, 23 Colum. J. Transnat'l. L. 561, 570–75 (1985); Rajeev Dhavan, Law as Struggle: Public Interest Law in India, 36 J. of the Indian Law Inst. 302, 306–308 (1994) [hereinafter Dhavan, Law as Struggle]. 26. For a recent and comprehensive account, see S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism in India: Trans- gressing Borders and Enforcing Limits (2002). The vast literature includes Baar, supra note 25; Up-endra Baxi, Courage Craft and Contention: The Indian Supreme Court in the Eighties (1985); Bhagwati, supra note 25; Dhavan, Law as Struggle, supra note 25; Jamie Cassels, Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: Attempting the Impossible? 37 Am. J. Comp. L. 495 (1989); Clark D. Cunningham, Public Interest Litigation in the Indian Supreme Court: A Study in the Light of American Experience, 29 J. of the Indian Law Inst. 494 (1987); Marc Galanter, New Patterns of Legal Services in India, in Law and Society in Modern India 279–95 (Rajeev Dhavan ed., 1989); Baxi, supra note 24; Oliver Mendelsohn, Life and Struggles in the Stone Quarries of India: A Case-Study, 29 J. of Com-monwealth and Comp. Pol. 44 (1991) G.L. Peiris, Public Interest Litigation in the Indian Subcontinent: Current Dimensions, 40 Int'l & Comp. L.Q. 66 (1991); S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism, 10 J. of Indian Sch. of Pol. Econ. 399 (1998); S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism (II): Post-Emergency Judicial Activism: Liberty and Good Governance, 10 J. of Indian Sch. of Pol. Econ. 603 (1998); Susan D. Susman, Dis-tant Voices in the Courts of India: Transformation of Standing in Public Interest Litigation, 13 Wis. Int'l L.J. 57 (1994); N. R. Madhava Menon, Justice Sans Lawyers: Some Indian Experiments, 12 In-dian Bar Rev. 446 (1985).
27. Implementation of legal aid before the Emergency was desultory. See generally G. Oliver Koppell, The Indian Lawyer as Social Innovator: Legal Aid in India, 3 Law & Soc'y Rev. 299 (1969). Among the many ‘populist' amendments to the Constitution enacted during the Emergency was a new Directive Principle decreeing "equal justice and free legal aid." See India Const. (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976 sec. 8, 39A. "The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities." Id. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. der the aegis of the Chief Justice of India, to coordinate the implementa-tion of legal aid programs.28 And, most strikingly, there appeared a num-ber of innovative legal service schemes in which social action groups for the first time sought to use law systematically and continuously to pro-mote the interests of various constituencies.29 For example, "middle class" organizations, such as the Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC), emerged which attempted to address pervasive prob-lems of public safety and consumer protection.30 With support from for-eign non-governmental organizations (NGOs), grassroots groups dedicated to protecting the rights of tribal people flourished, like AWARE in Andhra Pradesh31 and the legal aid program at Rajpipla in Gujarat.32 These organizations shared the conviction that law could be used effectively to promote the well being of various segments of the population. These programs pointed beyond the prevailing "service" notion of legal aid as episodic ad hoc representation in court by generalist lawyers. Instead these new initiatives envisioned "strategic" operations of a scale, scope, and continuity that enabled lawyers to acquire specialized exper-tise, coordinate efforts on several fronts, select targets and manage the sequence and pace of litigation, monitor developments and deploy re-sources to maximize the long-term advantage of a client group.33 The no-tion was to relieve disadvantaged groups from dependence on extraordinary, spontaneous personal interventions and thus to enable le-gal work to be calculating and purposive rather than atomistic. Public interest litigation has promoted important social changes, raised public awareness of many issues, energized citizen action, ratch-eted up governmental accountability, and enhanced the legitimacy of the judiciary.34 But judicially orchestrated public interest litigation has 28. The Committee on Implementation of Legal Aid Schemes (CILAS) was established in 1980 by the government of India with Supreme Court Justice (as he was then) P.C. Bhagwati as Chair of Budget Activities. 29. See, e.g., Galanter, supra note 26, at 279–95; Charles R. Epp, The Rights Revolution 97 (1998); D. L. Sheth & Harsh Sethi, The NGO Sector in India: Historical Context and Current Dis-course, 2 Voluntas 49 (1991). 30. See Friedrich Naumann Stiftung, India, Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC), at http://fnf-southasia.org (last visited Mar. 24, 2004) 31. See Sakuntala Narasimhan, Empowering Women: An Alternative Strategy From Rural India 75–94 (1999) (describing the history and current activities of AWARE [Action for Welfare and Awakening in Rural Environment]). 32. See The Week, at http://www.the-week.com. Galanter, supra note 26, at 279–95; Peiris, supra note 26. 34. In 2002 Professor S.P. Sathe published a detailed study documenting how the environment, the rights of women and minorities, the rights of the ill and poor, and others all received important GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR proved only to be a frail vessel for enlarging access to justice by empow-ering disadvantaged groups.35 Among its limitations are an inability to re-solve disputed questions of fact; weakness in delivering concrete remedies and monitoring performance; reliance on generalist volunteers with no organizational staying power; and dissociation from the organiza-tions and priorities of the disadvantaged.36 While affirming and dramati-cally broadcasting norms of human rights, the courts frequently were unable to secure systematic implementation of these norms.37 II. The Shift to Informalism Apart from failures of implementation, judicially supported public interest litigation aroused considerable resistance both from those who opposed its program and from those who were discomfited by the re-casting of the judicial role.38 However, there were some judges that avidly promoted public interest law and, as we noted earlier, they too were en-tranced by the image of informal conciliatory justice brought to the masses by the charismatic or expert outsider. In his 1976 report, Justice Bhagwati, the foremost judicial proponent of public interest litigation, proposed one-day forums to settle pending cases.39 As the surge of public interest law activity leveled off, the reform energies that had fueled its growth found new channels. Where promi-nent judges had been patrons and instigators of public interest litigation, their successors have become promoters of Lok Adalats. The dominant themes of "reform" have become informality, conciliation and alterna- protections as a result of public interest lawsuits filed by rights-conscious activists. See Sathe, supra note 26, at ch. 6. 35. See generally Agrawal, supra note 37. 36. See Epp, supra note 29, at 97–98; Galanter, New Patterns, supra note 26, at 279–82; Cunning- ham, supra note 26, at 506–07; Smitu Kothari, The Human Rights Movement in India: A Critical Over-view, in Rethinking Human Rights: Challenges for Theory and Action 83, 92–99 (Smitu Kothari & Harsh Sethi eds., 1991). 37. For empirical support for these two sentences, see Epp, supra note 29, at chs. 5–6 (noting how the public interest litigation docket of the Supreme Court, contrary to the conventional wisdom, failed to increase significantly between 1960 and 1990. Epp argues that the top-down approach in promoting public interest lawsuits only went so far, due to the limited resources grassroots public interest advo-cates had in bringing such cases in the first place). For an earlier critique of public interest litigation, see S.K. Agrawal, Public Interest Litigation In India: A Critique (1985). [[[Mendelsohn, supra note 26, at 46; Arun Shourie, Courts and Their Judgements: Premises, Prereqisites, Consequences (2001).]]] 38. Agrawal, supra note 35, at 10–13 (identifying several Supreme Court judges who have ex- pressed "a not-too-friendly posture to PIL [public interest litigation]"). 39. See P.N. Bhagwati, Report on National Juridicare: Equal Justice-Social Justice 41–42 (Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, 1976).
GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. tive institutions rather than vindication of rights through adversary proc-esses in mainstream adjudicative institutions.40 As the name suggests (again, literally, people's court), its sponsors seek to present it as indige-nous and traditional.41 The promoters of the official nyaya panchayats in the 1950s were eager to present them as a continuation of the historical panchayat institution. Similarly, the promoters of Lok Adalats stress their indigenous character and "rich tradition," even though they have little resemblance to earlier institutions.42 (Ironically, Harivallabh Parikh had regarded the Lok Adalat at Rangpur as an innovative rather than traditional forum.43) B. The ‘Character Traits' of Lok Adalats The early Lok Adalats approximated a standard template, although as we shall see there are many new variations. Cases on the docket of a local court (or tribunal) were, with the consent of one or both of the par-ties, transferred to a Lok Adalat list.44 At an intermittent one-day 40. Id. Part of the appeal of the Lok Adalats to judges may be that it reduces—all but elimi- nates—the role of lawyers in reform. 41. This institution goes by various appellations in different localities (settlement camp, settle- ment mela, lok nyayalaya, janata nyayalaya, neeti mela, etc.) but we use Lok Adalat throughout since it is the most common name and the one given official recognition in the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (amended 1994). For a critical assessment, see Sarah Leah Whitson, "Neither Fish, Nor Flesh, Nor Good Red Herring" Lok Adalats: An Experiment in Informal Dispute Resolution in India, 15 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 391 (1992). Empirical accounts of the working of Lok Adalats are rare, but see Robert S. Moog, Conflict and Compromise: The Politics of Lok Adalats in Varanasi Dis-trict, 25 Law & Soc'y Rev. 545, 552–64 (1991); Gene Kassebaum, ADR in India: The Lok Adalat as an Alternative to Court Litigation of Personal Injury and Criminal Cases in South India 5 (1989) (unpub-lished manuscript on file with authors). 42. See Yogesh Mehta, Lok Adalats and Public Interest Litigation (Ahmedabad: Gujarat State Legal Services Authority, 2000). An extended description of Lok Adalat organization and opera-tions, embedded in a full-blown ideological account of Lok Adalats as a people's movement establish-ing contemporary versions of ancient popular courts, may be found in Sunil Deshta, Lok Adalats: Genesis And Functioning: People's Programme For Speedy Justice (1995). In a similar vein, a team of Indian and American court reformers describe their reforms as "preserving and supporting formal litigation as a means of last resort, while simultaneously restoring and modernizing consensual dispute resolution processes often utilized in pre-colonial society." See Hiram E. Chodosh et al., Indian Civil Justice System Reform: Limitation and Preservation of the Adversarial Process, 30 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 1, 58 (1997–1998). Compare their bow to Nyaya Panchayats on 67A. Earlier they note that "Lok Adalats resemble the traditional panchayat system of five village elders acting as arbitrators for local dispute resolution." Id. at 41, n.130. But panchayats were not composed of village elders, rather of caste elders; depending on the circumstances they were no more arbitrators than mediators or legisla-tors; and, notwithstanding the name, there were not necessarily five. 43. Interview by Marc Galanter with Upendra Baxi, Professor of Law, University of Warwick, Warwick, Eng. (May 20, 2003). 44. The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (amended 1994); see also K. Ramaswamy, Settle- ment of Disputes Through Lok Adalat Is One of the Effective Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) on Statutory Basis, in Alternative Dispute Resolution: What It Is and How It Works 100 (P.C. Rao & William Sheffield eds., 1997); Moog, supra note 41, at 554. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR "camp," typically on a weekend day, attended by judges and other offi-cials and promoted with considerable hoopla, the cases are called before a mediator or panel of mediators.45 The mediators are typically retired judges or senior advocates.46 The first Lok Adalat was held in 1982.47 As of March 1996, some 13,061 had been organized nationwide and some 5,738,000 cases were re-solved there (about 440 per Lok Adalat).48 Twenty-one months later the total had risen to some 17,633 Lok Adalats and 6,886,000 cases settled.49 That means than in the twenty-one month period, 4572 Lok Adalats were held—some 218 per month or 2600 per year and that approximately 1.148 million cases were resolved (about 251 per Lok Adalat.) Unpub-lished data from the National Legal Services Authority shows that as of the end of 1999, 49,415 Lok Adalats were held with 9,720,289 cases being settled (about 198 per Lok Adalat).50 By November 30, 2001, there were 110,600 Lok Adalats that had settled 13,141,938 cases (about 119 settled per Lok Adalat).51 It is unclear whether this seemingly continuous drop in the number settled per Lok Adalat is due to the increasing number of Lok Adalats, less success in achieving resolution, fewer cases, smaller numbers of mediators, or more difficult and complex cases. There ap-pears to be considerable regional variation. In the state of Gujarat from March 1982 to the beginning of January 2000, 14,766 Lok Adalats were held; nearly 90% of all cases "dealt with" were settled.52 In contrast, dur-ing the first quarter of 2001, 651 Lok Adalats were conducted in Kerala with only 39% of the cases settled. Clearly there is much variability here and a larger empirical examination of these patterns is required before any final conclusions can be made. What sorts of cases are in Lok Adalats? One set of sophisticated commentators tells us that Lok Adalat cases are "limited to auto acci-dents and family matters."53 But the dockets are considerably more var-ied, including vast numbers of ordinance violations and minor criminal cases. While dockets vary from one place to another, generally they are 45. Robert S. Moog, Whose Interests Are Supreme: Organizational Politics in the Civil Courts in India 135–38 (1997); Ramaswamy, supra note 44, at 98. 46. Ramaswamy, supra note 44, at 98. 47. Id. at 96. 48. Id. at 102. 49. Press Release of Annual Report of Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, Press Bu- reau of India (July 2, 1998), available at http://pib.nic.in/focus/foyr98/fo0799/Foc0207981.html. 50. Data obtained from the National Legal Services Authority (NLSA), New Delhi, December 2001. We presume that the data is from 1982 onwards, however no official at the NLSA was able to confirm this point nor give us a reliable starting date as to when the data was first collected. 52. See The Gujarat State Legal Services Authority: Nyaya Path, December 2000, at 114. 53. Chodosh et al., supra note 42, at 43. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. shaped to capture cases involving the poor. Lok Adalats, says one pro-ponent, "specially cater to the needs of weaker sections of society."54 They are for "poor people," especially for petty non-contested cases.55 Many proponents of Lok Adalats see them not as a species of court re-form but as a species of legal aid, one particularly suited to the poor, op-pressed, and female. Like judicially inspired public interest law, the theme is bountiful caring for the weak, but the movement is centered not around eminent judges and prominent lawyers, but district judges, social workers and local advocates. Lok Adalats are typically not able "to attract cases with heavy finan- cial stakes or important civil litigation. Private litigation [has] remained totally outside the ambit of Lok Adalats."56 The Lok Adalat device has occasionally been used for mass settlement: resolving two separate tak-ings cases where residents of two different areas received approximately 1.5 billion and 186.8 million rupees respectively;57 and more recently sugar cane growers and laborers were awarded 12 million rupees in a Lok Adalat brokered settlement.58 In terms of how frequently it meets, originally the term Lok Adalat was used to refer to a transitory forum, staffed by volunteers and con-vened from time to time. It has grown to encompass a continuing institu-tion with fixed location and personnel. "[p]ermanent Lok Adalats [that] have . . been introduced in the vari-ous Government departments that provide services . . [including] the telephone companies, the electricity board, the municipal corporations, the city development authorities and the insurance compa-nies. . Today Lok Adalat-type mechanism is being invoked by Gov-ernment Departments and public sector agencies to settle pension and provident fund claims, bank debts, consumer grievances and similar small claims of a civil or revenue nature."59 The purpose of these permanent Lok Adalats "is to achieve the resolution of petty disputes between a citizen and such departments be-fore they reach the courts."60 In Part III, we will discuss permanent "in house" Lok Adalats in more detail. 54. P.C. Rao, Alternatives to Litigation in India, in Alternative Dispute Resolution: What It Is And How It Works 27 (P.C. Rao & William Sheffield eds., 1997). 55. Paras Diwan, Justice at the Door-Step of People: The Lok Adalat System, 78 All India Rep. J. 56. P.C. Rao, supra note 54, at 27. 57. Ramaswamy, supra note 44, at 97. 59. N.R. Madhava Menon, Lok Adalat: An Indian Contribution to World Jurisprudence, Souve- 60. S.P. Barucha, Keynote Address, Souvenir at 18–19. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR While proponents of Lok Adalats stress their participatory charac- ter, it is clear that the form of participation envisaged for poor claimants or defendants is reception of the guidance of their betters. The tribunal is to consist of "judicial officers of the area and . . educated social workers, law college teachers and retired judicial officers . . "61 They will give the poor "appropriate guidance."62 This picture seems to be confirmed by the knowledgeable reformers who tell us that in Lok Adalats, resolutions are fashioned by the evaluative views of the mediators, rather than through negotiations by the litigants.63 Others have sardonically described adjudi-cation in Lok Adalat as "banyan tree justice."64 C. Discovery and Award-Settlements How does the Lok Adalat deal with disputed questions of fact? Early on, one proponent boasted "[t]here will be no necessity for wit-nesses or examination or cross-examination, to produce legal documents or present case law."65 Other accounts suggest that controversy about facts, and perhaps about norms, rarely intrudes when Lok Adalats are sitting. Cases may be "already compromised by the persuasion and ef-forts of judges and advocates alike, for the purpose of being placed be-fore the Lok Adalats . . "66 There may be a "pre-Lok Adalat conference in which parties are approached by the legal aid team and discussions about the pros and cons of the case take place."67 Generally, the largest cases in Lok Adalats are claims by accident victims under the Motor Vehicle Act. This is the only type of case counted separately and statistics are compiled of the amount of compen-sation awarded in these cases. Thus, the Ministry of Law stated at the end of 1997 that some 349,710 motor vehicle accident claims had been resolved by Lok Adalats and some rupees 1160 crores awarded (this is an average award or rupees 33,190).68 Our data from the National Legal Ser- 61. K. Gupteswar, The Statutory Lok Adalat: Its Structure and Role, 30 J. of the Indian L. Inst. 174, 179 (1988). 62. Mahabaleshwar N. Morje, Lok Nyayalaya: A Place of Justice for Common Man in Changing Society, 71 All India Rep. J. 68, 69 (1984). 63. Chodosh et al., supra note 42, at 41 n.130. 64. This reference dates back to the early 1980's when it is said that one of the first Lok Adalats took place under a banyan tree in Gujarat. There is even evidence that this tradition has continued. For a recent account of a "banyan tree" Lok Adalat, see Yogindra Gupta, Mishap Victim Gets Rs 2.25 Lakhs, Trib. News Service, Apr. 24, 1999, available at http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99apr25/ haryana.htm. 65. Morje, supra note 62, at 68. 66. Virendra Singh Barhat, Judicial Courts v. Lok Adalats, 74 All India Rep. J. 5, 6 (1987). 67. Diwan, supra note 55, at 87. Release, Press Bureau of India, Annual Report of Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs (July 2, 1998), available at http://pib.myiris.com/archive; see also http://www .healthlibrary.com/reading/banyan2/9legal.htm, discussing how in the state of Andhra Pradesh, since GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. vices Authority show that by the end of November 2001, 825,255 of these cases had settled at an average award of 39,432.69 Lok Adalats therefore resolved over 10,000 motor accident cases per month during the last four years (475,545 in forty-seven months from January 1998 to the end of November 2001)—and at higher amounts. Gene Kassebaum's study of Lok Adalats in Karnataka from 1986 to late 1988, found that about sixty-two percent of the cases were motor ac-cident claims.70 Since the claimants in motor accident cases are typically passengers or pedestrians and the defendants are typically companies or government agencies, these matters "tend to be contests between the relatively rich and the relatively poor, the powerful and the weak."71 The sessions observed by Kassebaum were organized so that all the cases in-volving claims against a particular insurer or transport company were placed before the same panel, a considerable convenience to these de-fendants. The parties in these Karnataka Lok Adalats were represented by advocates—although advocates were excluded in the U.P. Lok Ada-lats described by Robert Moog.72 Most cases were settled after brief, of-ten perfunctory, negotiations that focused on the quantum of damages.73 The amounts awarded in Lok Adalats are arguably quite small. In the 13,553 cases resolved in Karnataka from 1986–1988 (of which 8537 were motor accident cases) the average settlement was rupees 14,758.74 This is only a small fraction of the arguably inadequate average damages awarded to claimants who persevere to fight their cases through the courts. A sample analysis some years back of the recoveries in motor ac- 1986, claimants have received over Rs. 44 lakhs in payments from automobile insurance companies; but see http://pib.myiris.com/archive evaluating the overall performance of Lok Adalats. The site states that between 1985 and 2000 "42,477 Lok Adalats were organised in different parts of the country where 90,74,971 cases were settled. In 4,88,669 motor accident claims cases, compensation amounting to rupees 2054,56,21,491 has been awarded." However, from this latter site it is unclear if of the 9,074,971 cases, only 488,669 were motor cases, in which cases the actual percentage of all cases being motor accident cases would be seemingly low, or whether there were other motor cases that did not settle. 69. Data provided to authors by the National Legal Services Authority. 70. Gene Kassebaum, ADR in India: The Lok Adalat as an Alternative to Court Litigation of Personal Injury and Criminal Cases in South India 5 (1989) (unpublished manuscript, on file with au-thors). Figures are for all Lok Adalats held in the state from June 1986 to mid-November 1988. Kasse-baum observes that "the big cities use the Lok Adalat to dispose of vehicle accident claims, the small towns and taluks use Lok Adalat to settle long pending criminal and other civil cases. The medium size cities do some of each." Id. at 16. See also Moog, supra note 45, at 135–46 (describing Lok Adalats in U.P. with dockets made up almost entirely of criminal and revenue cases).
71. Kassebaum, supra note 70, at 7.
72. Moog, supra note 41, at 554.
Kassebaum, supra note 70 (reporting that fifty-four percent of the cases that appeared at the Lok Adalat reached a settlement).
74. Id. at 15, 35. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR cident cases reported in the most comprehensive and widely circulated set of Indian law reports, the All-India Reporter, shows that at least for 1986 the average recovery in the thirty-one cases for which data was ob-tainable was rupees 48,376.75 Of course, the cases that were fought all the way to a High Court could be expected to involve more severe injuries on the average than those brought to a Lok Adalat. Forums similar to Lok Adalats are conducted by voluntary groups as well as by the courts. For example, the principal activity of the People's Council for Social Justice (PCSJ) in Kerala, is conducting Neeti Melas (festivals of justice). Staffed largely by retired judges and court person-nel, PCSJ urges people to avoid the courts and avail themselves of its services instead.76 Rather than a departure from the official norms, it proposes to give disputants' access to a purer, conciliatory, non-adversarial forum for the application of those norms.77 In fifteen years the PCSJ has conducted 227 Neeti Melas and has settled over 8000 motor accident cases.78 75. This analysis was performed by Mary Versailles, J.D., University of Wisconsin, class of 1990. In three other motor vehicle cases, recovery was confined to the statutory "no fault" award of Rs. 15,000 for death and Rs. 7500 for permanent disability. If three cases are included, the average recov-ery is reduced to Rs. 44,769. 76. See http://www.councilforjustice.org, which is the website of the organization. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. D. Preliminary (Pre-Fieldwork) Data on Lok Adalats The motor accident cases that figure so prominently in the caseload at the Lok Adalats, governmental and voluntary, are not cases diverted from the rigidities of ordinary unreformed civil proceedings. Instead they are cases diverted from a "reformed" and "streamlined" sector of the court system,79 the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, themselves estab-lished to provide expeditious proceedings with no court fees and some compensation available without a showing of fault. This accentuates the point that Lok Adalats should not always be considered as providing ad-ditional access to justice: while some of the Permanent Lok Adalats may address claims that have not yet been brought to a court or tribunal, overall the Lok Adalat docket is made up of cases that have already been brought to another forum. Lok Adalats do not provide new facilities for the vast portion of potential claims that are discouraged by court fees, the cost of lawyers, the prospects of delay, and paltry recoveries. More systematic data are needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn, but from the information presently available to us, it appears that the main work of Lok Adalats is to provide a truncated process for some of those few who do attempt to utilize the courts. Just five years after the judiciary began to sponsor Lok Adalats, Par- liament enacted The Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987, which was amended in 1994 and then again in 2002.80 The Act visualizes a regime of Lok Adalats with jurisdiction over "any matter,"81 composed of judicial officers and other qualified members,82 authorized to proceed according to its own procedures, which need not be uniform83 and to be "guided by the principles of justice, equity, fair play and other legal principles."84 Rather than an award in accordance with the law, the Lok Adalat is in-structed to "arrive at a compromise or settlement."85 The 1994 amend-ments to the Act mandate that the compromise "shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute, and no appeal shall lie to any 79. Whitson, supra note 41, at 426. 80. The Legal Services Auth. Act, No. 39 of 1987, (1995) (amended 1994; amended 2002).
81. Id. at § 19(3).
82. Id. at § 19(2 83. Id. at § 22(2 84. Id. at § 20(4 ). This formula bears a striking resemblance to the "justice, equity and good con- science" that was the residual source of law in British India and elsewhere in the empire and remains so today in India and elsewhere. Although the formula was designed to enable courts to appeal to "sources of law other than English common and statute law," in practice its effect was "to introduce conceptions which strongly resemble the general character of English law." J. Duncan M. Derrett, Jus-tice, Equity and Good Conscience, in Changing Law In Developing Countries 138, 150 (J.N.D. Anderson ed., 1963). 85. Legal Services Auth. Act §20(3).
GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR court against the award."86 (The 2002 amendments reiterate this principle under section 22E.) Lok Adalats differ sharply from the earlier nyaya panchayats. The jurisdiction of Lok Adalats is not confined to specific categories of minor matters, but can extend to "any matter." Instead of the popularly elected panches, Lok Adalat officials are nominees of the state administration. Where the panches could issue decisions, the Lok Adalat panelists—at least until now—can only "determine and arrive at a compromise or set-tlement."87 Table 1 summarizes some of the differences between Lok Adalats and various past and present forums for providing access to jus-tice for everyday troubles and injuries. 86. Id. at § 21(2). Even with this provision we are uncertain whether "the so-called final- ity . . [has] the effect of barring judicial review under articles 226, 227, 32, or 136 of the Constitution." See Gupteswar, supra note 61, at 181 (writing before the 1994 amendments, Gupteswar argued that judicial review was still possible).
87. Id. at § 19(5).
GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. Salient Features of Forums fo GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR This campaign to institutionalize Lok Adalats comes in spite of (and perhaps because of) the fact that little is known about their performance. One serious issue that immediately comes to mind is whether this "in-formalism" disadvantages weaker parties. The few available accounts raise a host of serious questions. For example, how genuine is the "con-sent" by which the parties consign their cases to Lok Adalats. Robert Moog portrays pressures on officials to produce large numbers of cases for Lok Adalats, leading in some instances to the institution of criminal cases for the purpose of having them resolved there.88 Also, cases that have in effect been resolved in the courts are assigned to Lok Adalats to inflate the total of resolutions there.89 Clearly, there are career incentives for officials to produce the cases and settlements desired by their superi-ors. Beyond this, there are questions about the quality of the process: Are the issues salient to the parties ventilated? Are the merits of their cases effectively presented? Can the forum probe and resolve conflicting assertions of fact? Do the resolutions embody legal standards? What is the procedure for enforcing decisions? How regularly are decisions en-forced? How do the outcomes compare with the parties' legal entitle-ments? Are outcomes reasonably consistent with one another? Apart from these questions about the resolution of specific cases, there are questions about the general effects of the diversion of these claims to Lok Adalats.90 Does the diversion diminish the deterrent effect of awarding damages? Does it diminish the supply of precedents and im-pede the development of tort doctrine and expertise that are responsive to India's new industrializing economy? If it relieves the courts to do other things, what do they in fact do? Does it encourage or discourage preventive measures by frequent injurers (e.g., bus companies) and their insurers? Neither those who operate Lok Adalats nor those who pro-mote them have displayed much interest in systematic assessment of the quality of their performance. Such assessment is essential to ascertain whether the results justify the expenditures and commend these initia-tives over others.91 Assessment involves comparing the performance of 88. Moog, supra note 41, at 557–65; Moog, supra note 45, at 138–46. 89. Moog, supra note 41, at 557–65; Moog, supra note 45, at 138–46. 90. The following set of questions listed in the text presuppose that litigants are economically ra- tional actors. Of course, though, other considerations may also come into play such as family honor or potential opportunities that accompany delay. We are sensitive to these other "non-rational" incen-tives, but for an overall discussion of "general effects" associated with litigation. See Marc Galanter, The Radiating Effects of Courts, in Empirical Theories About Courts 117–42 (K. Boyum & L. Mather eds., 1983). 91. On the formidable conceptual and methodological problems involved in evaluating alterna- tive methods of dispute resolution see Marc Galanter & Mia Cahill, Most Cases Settle: Judicial Promo-tion and Regulation of Settlements, 46 Stan. L. Rev. 1339 (1994).
GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. the Lok Adalats with the aspirations their promoters have for them. So far, what is remarkable is how modest these aspirations are. Proponents of Lok Adalats, like earlier reformers, claim to draw on the legacy of panchayats. But as table 1 summarizes, they are distinct from traditional panchayats in virtually every respect: they operate in the shadow of the official courts; they are staffed by official appointees rather than communal leaders; they apply some diluted version of state law rather than local or caste custom; they arrange compromises instead of imposing fines and penances backed up by the sanction of excommu-nication. Nor can Lok Adalats be viewed as a continuation of the push for nyaya panchayats that peaked in the 1950s. The proponents of nyaya panchayats sought to provide a convenient, accessible, understandable forum that would encourage popular participation, express popular norms, and promote harmonious interaction. They were unable to de-liver on this, but the aim was to provide a system of justice superior to that of India's British-style courts. In contrast, the virtues claimed for Lok Adalats are their expeditiousness and lower processing cost.92 What commends them is not that they deliver a superior form of justice, but that they represent deliverance from the agony of litigation in a system conceded to be terrible. The Lok Adalats' achievement, then, is to provide an official process for claimants to secure a portion of their entitlements without the aggra-vation, extortionate expense, inordinate delay and tormenting uncer-tainty of the court process.93 To secure this, they yield up discounts. Assume, for example, a motor accident claimant who would secure Rs. 50,000 compensation [and accumulated interest from date of filing] after an expensive ten-year struggle in the courts. Imagine that this same claimant might be able to get half that amount at a Lok Adalat in just a few months. 94 This is clearly a preferable outcome for the claimant, given the legal costs avoided and given the appropriate discount for the futu-rity and uncertainty of the court recovery. Thus the establishment of the Lok Adalat arguably provides a significant benefit for a claimant in this situation. But, of course, this claimant is entitled not to the discounted future value of his claim, but to the full present value. What makes the delivery of the discounted amount a "benefit" is simply that the full entitlement can be vindicated only by recourse to a disastrously flawed judicial sys-tem that at best can deliver it in ten years. Thus the "benefit" conferred 92. See Shiraz Sidhva, Lok Adalats: Quick, Informal Nyaya, Lex Et Juris , Dec. 1986, at 36–41. 93. See Gupteswar, supra note 61, at 174. 94. But see Diwan, supra note 55, at 85 (claiming that discounts are only five to ten percent of the value of the claim). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR by the availability of the Lok Adalat is a benefit only by virtue of the enormous transaction costs imposed by the judicial system.95 And these transaction costs impact differentially on different kinds of parties. Those who are risk averse and unable to finance protracted litigation are the ones who have to give the discounts in order to escape these costs; those who occupy the strategic heights in the litigation battle are able to com-mand steep discounts.96 Since the sums awarded by the courts fall far short of fully compensating the injured, the injured are triply under-compensated: first, by the inadequate level of compensation delivered by the courts; second, by the high transaction costs; and finally by the dis-counts they must yield to avoid the infliction of these costs. And, as the injured are under-compensated, injurers are under-assessed for the costs they impose on society for their risk-creating behavior and under-deterred from persisting in injurious conduct.97 The establishment of Lok Adalats represents the use of scarce re- form energies to create alternatives that are "better" than the courts; but it is not necessary to be very good to be better than the ordinary judicial system. The flaws of the system serve not as a stimulus to reform it, but as a reason for setting up institutions to bypass it. Reformers take pride in delivering needed compensation more expeditiously to some of the victims. But the features of the system that make this discounted result appear to be an advance go unexamined and unattacked. Lok Adalats are then an instance of a debased informalism—debased because it is commended not by the virtues of the alternative process but by avoid-ance of the torments of the formal institutional process. III. Visits to the Field During the latter half of 2002 and early and middle parts of 2003, we observed a sample of Lok Adalats in one of India's most politically and economically important states.98 In this section, we discuss how our find-ings compare with the conventional wisdom on these dispute resolution forums.99 As already stated, the Lok Adalat in India is not a homogenous 95. For purposes of the argument here, transaction costs include lawyers' fees, court fees, bribes and other litigation expenses, uncertainty of outcome and uncertainty of execution if a favorable out-come is obtained.
Galanter, Why the ‘Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 Law & Soc'y Rev. 95, 119–20 (1974); See generally, H. Laurence Ross, Settled out of Court (1970). 97. For a general evaluation of how the injured and poor are treated by the Indian legal system, see N.R. Madhava Menon, Legal Aid and Justice for the Poor, in Law and Poverty: Critical Essays (Upendra Baxi ed., 1988). 98. To protect the confidentiality of the people we observed and interviewed, we purposely with- hold the name of the state. 99. Conducting the fieldwork for this study was Jayanth K. Krishnan. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. institution. There are many types and the numbers grow by the day. In this section we discuss five particular Lok Adalats: what we might call a General Lok Adalat that usually hears motor accident cases and family law disputes; an Electricity Lok Adalat; a government Pension Lok Ada-lat; a High Court Lok Adalat; and a Women's Lok Adalat. (Because there was minimal activity at the Women's Lok Adalat the day it was ob-served, we mainly discuss the activity of the others.) We were further-more able to collect important (albeit incomplete) quantitative data on the operation of several other types of Lok Adalats. As we shall see, al-though the subject matter within each of these Lok Adalats is distinct, there are similarities in how these forums function. More evidence is re-quired before drawing any firm conclusions; however our data thus far confirm our worries that the quality of Lok Adalat justice falls seriously short of the aspirations of "Access to Justice" proponents. A. Setting the Scene Most of the observed Lok Adalats took place on a Saturday, begin- ning around ten in the morning and lasting anywhere from two to seven hours. The Electricity, Pension, High Court, and Women's Lok Adalats were held in moderately maintained, state government buildings, while the first observed General Lok Adalat was conducted in a recently con-structed, separate hall located adjacent to the district court. (A second observed General Lok Adalat was held in a district court building.) In most cases, retired justices from the state High Court chaired the judicial panels; in the General Lok Adalats a current, chief district judge served as head of that panel. The Legal Services Authority Act also mandates that judicial panels of Lok Adalats include one social worker and one lawyer or other legal expert and that one of the three members must be a woman. As we discuss below, there was variation regarding adherence to this requirement. The Electricity, Pension, High Court, and General Lok Adalats each had long lines of claimants who often waited hours before having their cases heard. (The day the Women's Lok Adalat was observed, only seven cases were on the court docket.) The rooms holding the sessions were stuffy, crowded, and lacked air conditioning. Claimants typically sat and listened for their names to be called by a government-employed Lok Adalat clerk before approaching the judicial panel. Standing next to the panel would be a court stenographer who, upon direction of the presid-ing judge, would write down for the record what the judge believed to be the pertinent information regarding the case. The presence of lawyers representing claimants varied depending on the Lok Adalat. In the Gen-eral, High Court, and Women's Lok Adalats most claimants came ac-companied by lawyers. In fact, as we will explain shortly, in the General GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR Lok Adalat, there was a situation where the same lawyer represented numerous bus passengers who were victims in a massive traffic accident. In the Electricity and Pension Lok Adalats the vast majority of claimants represented themselves. Most surprisingly, in the Electricity Lok Adalat, another party that was present and advocating a position (usually against the claimant) was the police. We discuss below how police participation impacted this Lok Adalat. B. Types of Cases Heard and the Process of Adjudication 1. The Pension and Electricity Lok Adalats Although the Pension and Electricity Lok Adalats deal with matters distinct from one another similar patterns are present in how these two forums operate. The Pension Lok Adalat handles cases brought by re-tired civil servants who are disputing the pension amount allocated to them by the government department for which they worked. The Pen-sion Lok Adalat also hears claims initiated by current civil service work-ers seeking a promotion or increased monetary compensation. A judicial panel consisting of a retired High Court judge, the General Secretary of the Retired Employees Association, and a practicing lawyer oversee these matters. The Pension Lok Adalat was statutorily created by our se-lected state in 2001, as a "permanent and continuous"100 body. According to the presiding judge, "500 cases have been settled in the last year and a half," in which each claimant received the requested amount from the governmental department.101 This statistic, however, is contrary to the in-formation provided by the Pension Lok Adalat office. According to the official data, as of December 12, 2002, 605 cases had been referred to the Pension Lok Adalat, with only 214 reaching settlements. 376 cases were adjourned, three were returned to the regular courts, and twelve had yet to be heard.102 Irrespective of this disparity, the presiding judge of the Pension Lok Adalat repeatedly expressed hostility towards the presence of lawyers in these forums and noted that were it not for them, the number of settled cases would dramatically increase.103 "Lawyers are famous," the judge commented to Krishnan, "for dragging on cases."104 But of the twenty-three cases Krishnan observed only three claimants even came accompa-nied by lawyers. Moreover, in thirteen cases (none of which had lawyers involved), the party guilty of being unprepared and delaying matters was 100. Language is from the state statute creating this Lok Adalat. 101. Interview with presiding judge of Pension Lok Adalat (Dec. 28, 2002). 102. Data was provided to Krishnan during his visit to the Pension Lok Adalat (Dec. 28, 2002). 103. Interview with presiding judge of Pension Lok Adalat (Dec. 28, 2002). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. the government agency. In six consecutive cases, the state's education department representative asked the panel for postponement, prompting the presiding judge to shout, "why the hell aren't you people ready? Is this how you run things over there?"105 (Nevertheless, the motion for de-lay in each case was granted.) And in that morning session, just three cases were resolved, with the remaining postponed to another sitting. The government's lack of preparedness also could be found in the Electricity Lok Adalat. This forum was established in 2001 to settle dis-putes between consumers and the state electricity company.106 According to the presiding judge of the Electricity Lok Adalat, ninety percent of the cases involve billing disputes—mainly claimants accusing the electricity company of excess charges.107 The remaining matters deal with the com-pany seeking compensation from individuals that the company contends have stolen electrical power. The day that Krishnan observed this Lok Adalat twenty-five cases were on the panel's docket. Thirteen resulted in a settlement while ten were postponed at the request of the company; two cases did not reach any resolution and the parties agreed to litigate these matters in the regular state court. Aside from the government not being prepared in nearly half of the cases in the Electricity Lok Adalat, there was another curious aspect to this proceeding. Of the twenty-five cases on the docket for that day, three involved the company making theft charges against individual con-sumers. Assisting the company in the presentation of its case to the two-member judicial panel was the police. Krishnan interviewed the police representative at the Lok Adalat who explained the reason for law en-forcement's participation. This official stated that typically when the company lodges a theft complaint against a private individual, protocol requires that a formal report be filed with the police department.108 A special police division investigates the complaint and if the charges are substantiated, then these findings are released to the company. At that point the company may pursue a civil liability claim in the district court, but if it and the defendant agree, then they may bring the case to the Electricity Lok Adalat for a speedier resolution.109 (The police reserve the right to file criminal charges against the individual with the city prosecutor.) But the police's role does not end with the investigation of the theft matter. As Krishnan observed, in the Electricity Lok Adalat the police 105. Presiding judge's comments made Dec. 28, 2002. 106. The mission of this Lok Adalat is similarly set forth in the statute creating this body. 107. Interview with presiding judge of Electricity Lok Adalat (Jan. 4, 2003). 108. Interview with police official present at Electricity Lok Adalat (Jan. 4, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR representative served as the lead advocate for the company. This official would explain the case to the judicial panel, question the defendant on the specifics of his actions, and make penalty recommendations. Mean-while, none of the defendants/consumers Krishnan observed had legal representation, nor were they able to present adequate responses to the satisfaction of the judicial panel or to the police. As the police represen-tative explained to Krishnan, "because we are familiar with these types of matters, it is quicker and better if we [rather than the company] deal with these cases."110 These criminal matters in the Electricity Lok Adalat, however, were not the only cases in which the police were involved. In at least a half dozen billing disputes the police representative argued on be-half of the company against the consumer. In the last case of the day, one that happened to be the most heated dispute of all those on the docket, the police official directly denounced the consumer for wasting the panel's time and urged him to pay the bill once and for all, which the consumer ultimately did. Even the presiding judge of the Electricity Lok Adalat conceded in an interview following the proceedings that claim-ants may, at times, "feel somewhat intimated" with the police being pre-sent.111 The police involvement in the Electricity Lok Adalat is reminiscent of Dr. Julia Eckert's recent description of the Shiv Sena courts in Maharashtra, where police officials there served not just as en-forcers but also as interpreters and arbitrators of the law.112 2. General Lok Adalats Two different General Lok Adalats in two different cities, where in each setting the respective chief judge served as head of the judicial panel, were observed during the course of the field research. The first General Lok Adalat observed was located in a district about twenty miles outside of the capital city. The morning set of cases involved sev-eral divorce matters. Before even going to the Lok Adalat room, couples would enter the presiding judge's private office, where their respective lawyers presented the reasons for the divorce application. In this "pre-Lok Adalat" hearing, the judge explained to the participants that his main goal was to see if the marriage could be salvaged. "Especially if there are children," he explained, "we want to try to do whatever we can to achieve reconciliation."113 The expectations of the parties, however, during these pre-Lok Ada- lat hearings were far different. In the observed cases, formal separation, 111. Interview with presiding judge of Electricity Lok Adalat (Jan. 4, 2003). 112. Julia Eckert, Legal Pluralism, Legal Reality, and the Changing Modes of Policing in Mumbai 4 (2001) (unpublished manuscript, on file with authors). 113. This comment was made to Krishnan while the parties were in the room (Aug. 17, 2002). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. not reconciliation, was the main priority of the parties. In one notable case, a middle-class couple114 came into the room accompanied by their two young children and almost immediately began screaming at one an-other as well as to the judge. The wife accused the husband of having an extra-marital affair and emotionally abusing her, while the husband sobbed that his wife had made a false criminal complaint against him, which had resulted in his arrest. Throughout this whole episode, which lasted nearly one-half hour, the children sat quietly crying while the law-yers unsuccessfully attempted to calm their clients down. As this commotion was occurring, the presiding judge chatted with the second author (Krishnan) intermittently about how he had seen this couple now for the third time and how they still refused to try to recon-cile.115 At that point, the husband interrupted, yelling at the judge, "Sir, please, reconciliation is not possible!"116 Yet, the judge continued to ex-plain that this type of "venting session" was good for the couple's emo-tional health.117 He then called the children over to sit next to him and asked how they felt about their parents' fighting. Too nervous to speak, the eight-year-old boy shrugged, while his five-year-old sister held her brother's hand, continuing to weep. In a firm tone, the judge then noted to the parents: "See—is this how you want your children to see you? Is this nonsense you are fighting about really good for them? A boy and a girl need both a mother and father—this fighting is not good at all."118 With that, the judge ordered the couple to attempt to work their prob-lems out and to return next week if they could not resolve their differ-ences. As this family left, another family entered into the judge's chambers also for a pre-Lok Adalat hearing. The claimants in this case were the maternal grandparents of a seven-year-old Indian-American boy, whose parents had been killed in a traffic accident near their home in Chicago three years ago. Since the accident, the boy had been living with his ma-ternal grandparents in our selected state, but the paternal grandparents (the defendants) were seeking to establish some set of custodial rights. As opposed to the previous divorce case, here the lawyers for the parties played an active role, each explaining their case to the judge. The claim-ants' lawyer sought to have the judge issue a decree formally severing all legal ties of the paternal grandparents to the boy. According to this law-yer, the only reason the defendants sought custody was because of a one 114. Both the husband and wife were civil service employees. 115. Interview with presiding judge (Aug. 17, 2002). 116. Comment by husband made Aug. 17, 2002. 117. Interview with presiding judge (Aug. 17, 2002). 118. Presiding judge's comments made Aug. 17, 2002. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR hundred thousand dollar life insurance policy that the boy had received (in trust) upon his parents' death. The judge noted to Krishnan that a case of this financial magnitude was unusual for a Lok Adalat, and that this was one of the most emo-tionally trying matters he had ever seen.119 But he expressed annoyance at how involved the lawyers were in this case. When the defendants' law-yer attempted to present his case, the judge shouted: "Let me ask you, how many times did your clients visit the boy in the States? Were they even ever a part of his life?"120 When the lawyer tried to explain that the paternal grandparents were only of modest means and therefore could not afford to travel to the United States, the judge cynically responded, "If this is so, how do they expect to take care of a little boy, now?"121 That the judge asked these questions was not so troubling, given that the paternal grandparents admittedly had very little contact with their son since a family rift had occurred some years back. Noteworthy, how-ever, was the level of hostility the judge expressed towards these lawyers who attempted to advocate on behalf of their clients. The judge ulti-mately proposed a tentative settlement between the parties, whereby the claimants could supervise weekend visits to the defendants' residence while the boy was on summer holidays. But because neither side was comfortable with the proposal, the judge told them to return the follow-ing week for another meeting. Later over lunch, the judge stated to Krishnan that the lawyers in this case were the ones who continued to prevent an amicable solution.122 Had they not been involved, he com-mented, an agreeable settlement more likely would have been reached.123 This disregarding attitude towards lawyers was particularly high- lighted during the afternoon session where Krishnan observed a case in-volving twenty-six claimants who were seeking compensation from a state-owned bus company for injuries they sustained during a violent traffic accident. Assisting the district judge in the adjudication of this matter was a social worker and another judge of that same court. The victims were uneducated, rural villagers who, through their lawyer, ac-cused the bus driver of gross negligence. On one side of a table separat-ing the parties were several bus company officials and their lawyer; on 119. Interview with presiding judge (Aug. 17, 2002). 120. Presiding judge's comments made Aug. 17, 2002. 122. Interview with presiding judge Aug. 17, 2002. 123. This resentment towards lawyers was also expressed by a judge from the Women's Lok Ada- lat. This individual, a prominent lawyer before retiring two years ago, stated that in her Lok Adalat, "lawyers are always up to no good." The Women's Lok Adalat deals almost exclusively with cases of divorce, and as she noted, "things run so much more smoothly" when the parties come on their own without counsel. Interview with judicial officer from Women's Lok Adalat (Jan. 5, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. the other side was the line of victims who all were represented by the same lawyer. The claimants' lawyer would present each victim who one-by-one told the three-judge panel of the injuries he/she incurred. The claimants' lawyer would then provide to the panel medical reports and in some cases x-rays of each victim's injuries. The panel would review the reports and then the chief district judge would hold each x-ray up to the light and attempt to decipher the seriousness of the injuries. When Krishnan asked if he had medical training to read the x-rays, the judge noted that since he had been involved in many of these types of cases in the past, he had developed a "knack" for this skill.124 In terms of the settlements, the negotiations followed a definite pat- tern. The bus company would propose a figure, the claimants' lawyer would (half-heartedly) counter, the bus company would then state an-other figure, and in three-fourths of the cases observed, the district judge would actively support the company's proposed amount. (In those mat-ters where the judge did not completely endorse the company's offer, he negotiated a settlement where the final figure still came close to the company's second proposal.) Three other observations merit mention. First, when the claimants' lawyer ultimately accepted the settlement, he would do so without even consulting the clients. Second, the bus com-pany's lawyer rarely spoke during any part of the proceeding; the com-pany officials directly engaged in the negotiations. And third, on average, each individual case took anywhere between fifteen seconds to two min-utes to resolve. After the proceedings, Krishnan questioned the claimants' lawyer about the assembly-line manner in which he handled these cases. Before answering, the lawyer made it a point to note that professionally he struggles to attract clients and is further hindered by his lack of legal ex-perience.125 One way he has sought to improve his contacts as well as his professional capital is by working in Lok Adalats. Because Lok Adalats are promoted by people who the lawyer perceives as having the power and the ability to help him professionally, he makes it a point to work in these forums. Eventually, however, he did confess that the powers-that-be, he felt, evaluated his productivity (and that of the Lok Adalat) on the number of cases disposed during a Saturday session.126 In July 2003 judges from the capital's Civil (District) Court Complex invited Krishnan to compare how their General Lok Adalat operated with what we just described. While there were some noticeable differ- 125. Interview with claimants' lawyer (Aug. 17, 2002). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR ences between the two, more striking were the number of similarities present. In terms of the differences, first, consider the physical setting of the capital city General Lok Adalat. Unlike in the above example where there was a separate hall dedicated especially for dealing with Lok Ada-lat cases, the City Civil Complex contained several courtrooms where every Saturday one or more of these would be used for hearing Lok Adalat matters. Litigants would line the walls both inside and outside of the courtroom waiting for a government "caller" to scream out their names to proceed to the Lok Adalat bench. A long table, approximately four feet wide and fifteen feet long, would separate the petitioner from the defendant and at the head of this table would sit the three-judge panel, made up of a social worker, an advocate/lawyer, and civil judge. Although these General Lok Adalat hearings would occur every Satur-day, they could also be held several days during the week, if a matter pending in the regular courts that was thought to be close to compromise was diverted into this dispute resolution forum. Another difference between the urban, General Lok Adalat and the first one observed involves the role played by the chief district judge. We saw that the first judge was hands-on and very micro-managerial. In con-trast, the capital city's chief district judge acted more like a supervisor, checking-in now and then to see how the judicial panel was functioning and staying updated on its progress.127 But even though this chief judge appeared more detached, his impact and presence on the General Lok Adalat remained quite significant. During Krishnan's observations it was common for the judicial panel—minus the chief judge—to work for about an hour or so attempting to settle various disputes. The majority of matters coming before the panel included: divorce cases, property dis-putes, and motor vehicle accident claims. Suddenly in the middle of a case, the chief judge would walk into the room, where everyone then would immediately stand to greet him with great respect.128 He would go over to the bench, ask for a summary of the case being heard, and then take the lead in trying to bring this matter to a resolution. (The other members of the judicial panel would feverishly change their seats to make sure that the chief judge was front-and-center.) From there, the chief judge would exhibit what one of the members of the judicial panel told Krishnan was "great leadership."129 For exam-ple, in the first case where he interceded, the chief judge listened to a lawyer representing an injured factory employee state how his client was 127. There were two separate observations made of this capital city General Lok Adalat. The first occurred on July 19, 2003, and the second occurred on July 26, 2003. 128. This type of intervention occurred during both of Krishnan's visits. 129. Interview with judicial officer (July 19, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. not receiving worker's compensation because the employer had failed to pay the necessary premiums. The opposing counsel responded that under the law the employer was exempt from having to purchase this particular type of insurance and thus was not liable for injuries suffered by any worker. Visibly frustrated that the case was not being compromised, the chief judge began scolding both parties' lawyers for their role in perpetu-ating this dispute. Speaking to the worker's lawyer, the judge stated: "You know he [the employer] doesn't have the bloody money to pay what you're asking. So why do you insist on not trying to work with him?"130 And turning to the employer's lawyer, he declared: "Obviously this poor guy is hurt and this happened at your client's plant. Don't you feel some responsibility to do something?"131 He then dismissed the par-ties, ordering them to see if they could settle their case on their own and to return next week if such compromise failed. After they left the courtroom, Krishnan spoke separately to the law- yers for both sides. The worker's lawyer expressed great frustration that the judge "did not even bother"132 to look at the receipts of all the medi-cal expenses incurred by his client. He noted that even if his client re-duced his financial demands by one-half, there still would be no way the worker could cover these costs on his own. "At least the other judges [i.e., those on the original Lok Adalat panel] were listening to my client's difficulties. We did not even get to make our case here."133 The em-ployer's lawyer also was dismayed about what had just occurred. "How can he [the employer] settle or reach a compromise if he has no money to give? Why we even bother to come here [to the Lok Adalat], I just don't know."134 The resignation expressed by this second lawyer turned out to be a rather common sentiment. Several lawyers stated that while on occasion participating in Lok Adalats did bring about quicker settlements for their clients, in most cases judges refused to take the time to study what often were complex issues, examining, for example, important evidence in a very cursory manner or simply not at all. Indeed, frustrated by what they perceived as the heavy-handedness of the chief judge, four different law-yers interviewed said that they have begun to engage "quietly" in tactics that they hope will eventually undermine the Lok Adalat process.135 For instance, after being lectured by the chief judge for not having his client 130. Chief judge, comments made in court (July 19, 2003). 132. Interview with worker's lawyer (July 19, 2003). 134. Interview with employer's lawyer (July 19, 2003). 135. Interview with separate lawyer present at General Lok Adalat (July 19, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR present in a property law dispute for now the third time, a reprimanded lawyer pulled Krishnan aside telling him that he purposely instructed his client not to show up at that day's Lok Adalat hearing.136 Since the Legal Services Authority Act, which governs Lok Adalats, requires that disput-ing parties sign onto all compromises reached, so long as this lawyer's client continued to refuse to make himself available no pact could be fi-nalized. The ultimate goal, the lawyer indicated, was to put this case back into the regular courts, where he believed his client had the best chances of success.137 Another way that lawyers have exhibited this passive resistance138 is by not showing up themselves to a Lok Adalat hearing. The following week, for example, Krishnan returned to the City Civil Court where he witnessed a divorce proceeding involving a Muslim couple. In India, reli-gious law typically governs family law cases dealing with issues such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and the like. Thus Hindu law applies to Hindu couples, Islamic/Shariat law applies to Muslim couples, Christian law applies to Christian couples, and so on. Elsewhere we have detailed how this system operates,139 but for our purposes here it is important to recognize that the Indian state courts are charged with administering the relevant religious law.140 When a case is brought before a Lok Adalat, the same principle is present; the judicial panel is asked, for example, in the case of a Muslim couple seeking a divorce to apply the norms set forth in the Shariat. But oftentimes neither the judges nor the parties are familiar with what can be complex provisions in the Shariat regarding divorce. In these situations deference is frequently given to the lawyers who pre-sumably have practiced for years in this area and are more familiar with how the law should be applied. Yet without the lawyers present—as was the case that Krishnan observed involving the Muslim couple petitioning for divorce—the panel and the parties are reluctant to finalize a settle-ment that may not comport with the traditions of Islamic law. The result 136. Interview with "reprimanded" lawyer (July 19, 2003). 138. For a classic, academic discussion of how passive resistance is used, see generally James Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Form of Peasant Resistance (1987). 139. Marc Galanter & Jayanth K. Krishnan, Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel, 34 Israel L. Rev. 98 (2000). 140. For a complete set of bibliographic resources on personal law in India, see id. For a selected sample of citations, see Gerald Larson, Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment (2001); Swapna Mukhopadhyay, In the Name of Justice: Women in Law and Society (1998); J.D.M. Derrett, An Introduction to the Legal System (1968); John Mansfield, The Personal Laws or a Uniform Civil Code?, in Religion and Law in Independent India (Robert Baird ed., 1993); Archana Parashar, Do Changing Conceptions of Gender Justice Have a Place in Indian Women's Lives? A Study of Some Aspects of Christian Personal Law, in Changing Concepts of Rights and Justice in South Asia 140 (Michael R. Anderson & Sumit Guha eds., 2000). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. then is a postponement of the matter until lawyers for both parties can make themselves available to the Lok Adalat. Following the adjournment of this Muslim divorce case, Krishnan in- terviewed first the husband and then the wife. While the husband side-stepped the question of why his lawyer did not appear, the wife directly stated that her lawyer had purposely not attended for fear that the wife would not receive a fair hearing in this forum.141 According to the wife, her lawyer had little confidence that the judicial panel (particularly if the chief judge was present) would show the lawyer the deference he be-lieved he deserved.142 The lawyer also apparently stated to the wife that it would be the judge's biased beliefs that would dictate the outcome rather than the principles of equity or law. Since the Lok Adalat lacked any en-forcement power to make the lawyer attend, the plan was that eventually the case (after going through several postponements) would be re-directed to the regular state courts where the lawyer believed he would have a better shot at obtaining a more favorable outcome for his client.143 (It seems that the lawyer mentioned to the wife that the regular state courts have over the past few decades expanded the rights of Muslim women in divorce matters, beyond what traditionally has been allowed for by the Shariat.144) 141. Interview with Muslim wife (July 26, 2003). 144. For case law supporting this, see Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fissalli, A.I.R. 1979 S.C. 362, 365– 66; Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali, A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1730, 1736; Mary Roy v. State of Kerala, A.I.R. 1986 S.C. 1011, 1014; Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 945, 954. See also Flavia Agnes, Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women's Rights in India (1999) (Ullah v. Uttar Pradesh, Writ Pet. 45 1993; Writ Petition 57 1993). For the third case, where a Bombay High Court ruled that Muslim divorced women are entitled to maintenance payments beyond what is pre-scribed by the Shari'a, see Sultan Shahin, Ulema to Launch Campaign for Personal Law, Times of In-dia 1999 (internet edition). (1999). A decision by the Supreme Court in April 2003 illustrates the Court's willingness, at least in an indirect manner, to reenter the debate over women's rights in family law cases. In upholding a family court divorce decree that gave a Muslim woman more property rights than are typically allowed under Muslim personal law, the Court refused to entertain the husband's petition that family courts (which are special courts created under the Family Courts Act of 1984 but are still part of the governmental judicial system and answerable to the Supreme Court) do not have jurisdiction to render such a verdict. For a full discussion of this case, see J. Venkatesan, Family Courts Can Decide Property Disputes, The Hindu, Apr. 18, 2003, available at 2003 WL 18909860. Also, in July 2003, the Supreme Court in overturning a Christian personal law dealing with inheritance, stated in dicta that India should eventually move towards considering a uniform civil code. This statement from Chief Justice Khare resulted in widespread protest by various religious minority communities as well as a host of scholars, academics, and commentators. See SC Favors Uniform Civil Code, India Express (internet edition), at http://www.indiaexpress.com/news/national/20030723-1.html (July 23, 2003) (not-ing a comment by the Chief Justice, "It is a matter of regret that Article 44 of the Constitution [which calls for the government to endeavor towards a uniform civil code] has not been given effect to. Par-liament is still to step in for framing a common civil code in the country. A common civil code will help the cause of national integration by removing the contradictions based on ideologies."). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR That lawyers are strategically acting in this manner is of no surprise to members of the Lok Adalat's judicial panel or to the chief judge. "We are not stupid,"145 the chief judge told Krishnan. "We know what they are doing and how they are trying to frustrate our efforts, but we do the best we can and try not to bother with them."146 In fact to illustrate how well the Lok Adalat can function without lawyers, the chief judge made it a point to highlight another divorce case that he personally settled. In this matter, a Hindu couple from a rural village came before the Lok Adalat to petition for a divorce. As in the Muslim divorce case described above, neither party's lawyer attended the Saturday session. Nevertheless, the chief judge, determined to broker a settlement, spent nearly twenty min-utes listening to the complaints and demands of both the husband and wife. The main contested issue in this case involved alimony for the wife; she was seeking more than the husband was willing to pay. Confused by her unwillingness to reduce her demands by even one rupee, the judge therapeutically asked the wife why she was so hostile and angry. The wife responded by saying that the husband had flaunted his affair with an-other woman throughout the village, utterly humiliating the wife. At this point the chief judge had what might be described as a "eureka" mo-ment. He demanded to know from the husband why he had behaved in this manner. "You are having a concubine and you don't even feel ashamed,"147 he inquired. "What you have done is very wrong, and you need to compensate her [the wife] properly,"148 the judge stated. After some further cajoling the husband reluctantly agreed to the wife's de-mands and thereafter the matter was disposed. The judge then, address-ing Krishnan as well as about twenty students from a nearby law school who were observing this session as part of their clinical training, empha-sized two important morals of this particular episode. First, he said, thanks to the Lok Adalat this case, which would have potentially lasted for years in the regular courts, is now completed and the parties can go on with their lives. Second, this matter was expeditiously resolved mainly because there were no lawyers present. Lawyers, he asserted, would have raised "useless"149 objections and made time-consuming, irrelevant argu-ments. Keep this in mind, the judge told the students, because they were after all the next generation of India's best and brightest legal minds. 145. Interview with chief judge (July 26, 2003). 147. Chief judge, address to law students (July 26, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. The discord that is present between judges and lawyers within both the General Lok Adalats seems to reflect a deep tension that proponents of this institution to date have not fully acknowledged. In the next sec-tion we turn to examining another type of forum, the High Court Lok Adalat, where judge-lawyer hostility has similarly serious implications for the claimants seeking to access justice. 3. The High Court Lok Adalat150 The High Court Lok Adalat is an interesting creature. Established in 2000, it meets one weekday a month in a building located next to the High Court that houses the state Legal Services Authority Commis-sion.151 This particular Lok Adalat seeks to dispose of the thousands of cases that continue to backlog the High Court. The matters that typically come before the High Court Lok Adalat are petty criminal cases that the Indian penal code characterizes as compromise-able, or "compound-able." In American terms, the institution serves to facilitate plea bargains between the state's public prosecutor and the petty criminal defendant. (Where the victim is an individual, the public prosecutor generally con-sults with the victim before striking any deal.) There is a three-judge panel that presides over the High Court Lok Adalat: a retired High Court judge, along with two advocates.152 As with the other Lok Adalats, at least one member of the panel must be a woman, but the statutory re-quirement that the panel include a social worker was not strictly en-forced.153 On the day that Krishnan traveled to the High Court Lok Adalat, sixteen cases were scheduled for hearing. Yet before the session began, the presiding judge informed Krishnan that he was very skeptical of reaching a settlement in any case. "These damn lawyers are just not showing up,"154 he commented. "They are following the order of the [state] Bar Council not to come and work in the Lok Adalat."155 As it turned out, half of the defense lawyers did attend that day's session with their clients, but the proceedings were delayed because the public prose-cutor arrived over thirty minutes late—much to the dismay of the presid-ing judge who quietly remarked to Krishnan, "these lawyers are all alike, regardless of who they work for. Delay is all they know."156 150. The observation of this Lok Adalat by Krishnan occurred on July 30, 2003. 151. Interview with the presiding judge of the High Court Lok Adalat (July 30, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR Eventually the session began; the separate defendants had their re- spective counsel present and the judicial panel called each individual up one-by-one. Six of the cases involved "excise" matters, or otherwise put, state charges against a defendant for selling alcohol without a license. On this issue of excise, the Indian Penal Code is both complex and technical. Under some circumstances excise violations will be compoundable (e.g., when the amount of alcohol sold is under ten liters), while others will not be.157 In five of the six cases, the violations were found to lie outside of the High Court Lok Adalat's jurisdiction, much to the ire of the presid-ing judge who scolded the lawyers on both sides for not knowing this be-forehand. Yet in every one of the cases that was dismissed, the judicial panel scrutinized the statutes to see if there was any way of fitting the re-spective cases into one of the compoundable categories. In his eagerness to find a way to resolve more than just one dispute, a judicial officer not on the bench but who happened to be visiting this session and serving as an active advisor to the panel stated in an exasperated voice, "I really think if we read the provision this way, we can make this work."158 If there was great frustration that almost all of the excise cases failed to meet the penal law's compoundability requirement, then consider how the panel reacted when a different type of case that could be settled, was not. The last case of the day involved two defendants who already had been convicted in criminal court of violating Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. That provision states that it is a crime to: Assault or [use] criminal force to a woman with the intent to outrage her modesty—whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby out-rage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either de-scription for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine or both.159 Both of the defendants had been sentenced to a prison term and or- dered to compensate the victim financially, but they were appealing their case to the High Court. On appeal the High Court affirmed the lower court's prison sentence, however it recommended to the public prosecu- 157. Laws regulating liquor in India date back to 1944, when the pre-Independent state, under the British Raj, passed the Central Excise Act of 1944. Since 1944 some states have viewed the central government's legislation as providing the floor or the minimum regulation, and thus have tightened up restrictions accordingly. 158. Judicial officer, comments while observing High Court Luk Adalat (July 30, 2003). 159. India Pen. Code § 354. For a discussion of this matter, see Review of Rape Laws, March 2000, Law Commission of India (Mar. 25, 2000), available at www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/ rapelaws.htm. The Centre for Social Research, a prominent non-governmental organization in India, has devoted considerable time to evaluating and critiquing the compoundability aspect of Section 354. http://www.csrindia.org/ctogotodo.html. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. tor and the defense lawyers that they try to hammer out an agreement on the issue relating to compensation.160 Also present at this hearing was the assaulted teenage victim and her older, very feeble father. The judicial panel summoned the two, along with the public prosecutor and the defendants' lawyers to the bench. The judges urged the parties to come to some sort of financial settlement so the matter could be disposed. As the prosecutor and defense lawyers be-gan to negotiate, the victim's father requested to speak. He asked: if the lower court's prison sentence was affirmed, why did its original, levied compensation award require any adjustment at all? He explained that his family was poor and struggled to eek out an existence. Lowering the award, even by just a few hundred rupees, would have a significant im-pact on him, his wife, and his children. The presiding judge tried to ex-plain to the father the bigger picture of why it was important not to clog the High Court with matters that could be easily resolved here in the Lok Adalat. But the father, although timid in the way he spoke, remained resolute. He would not agree to any reduction in compensation and if the case needed to be sent back to the High Court for a final decision, then so be it. Angered that no compromise could be reached the presiding Lok Adalat judge adjourned the matter and ordered the parties to re-solve their dispute in the regular state court. In spite of the low number of settlements that occurred during Krishnan's visit to the High Court Lok Adalat, state Legal Services Au-thority officials hastened to point out that this day was an anomaly. Ac-cording to these officials, 2003 has been a banner year; in particular, between January 1 and May 31 nearly 3000 cases have settled, with total awards reaching over half a million rupees.161 Moreover, the staff at the Legal Services office proudly displayed to Krishnan the year-by-year to-tal of excise settlements dating back to 2000. Table 2 illustrates the re-sults. 160. For years the courts—despite heavy criticism from women's rights and civil rights groups— have deemed Section 354 as compoundable and thus eligible for Lok Adalat adjudication. This is the reason that, procedurally, the case could come before the High Court Lok Adalat. Id. 161. Interview with Legal Services Authority (July 30, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR Table 2162 Year-by-year Total of Excise Settlements Dating Back to 2000 Number of Excise Cases Total Amount of Money Settled by High Court Awarded (Rupees) by High Court Lok Adalat 2003 (Jan. 1–May 31) Upon closer scrutiny the data prove to be quite perplexing. We see that in its first year, 2000, the High Court Lok Adalat settled nearly 45,000 cases, and dispatched almost 20,000,000 rupees in awards. Just two years later though, in 2002, the number of cases settled dropped to about 10,000 and the awards issued fell to slightly over 2,000,000 rupees. If the first six months of 2003 are indicative, this year will be the lowest number of cases settled by the High Court Lok Adalat and the lowest amount of money awarded. Of course because the data from the Legal Services of-fice are incomplete in so many ways, we are left with more questions than answers. For example, what percentage of cases that come before this Lok Adalat are actually settled? Could it be that in 2000, ninety-five percent of the cases were settled, whereas in 2002 settlements occurred only ten percent of the time—or vice versa? Are fewer cases settled to-day because there are fewer disputes, fewer claimants willing to agree to a settlement, greater lawyer-obstinacy to work within these forums, or something else? The incomplete nature of the data collection was not restricted to the High Court Lok Adalat. Consider how the records bureau located inside the capital city's Civil Court Complex functions. This office keeps statistics on the activities of other types of Lok Adalats in the capital dis-trict. The staff provided Krishnan with access to a variety of records from 2002. For example, according to their data, last year a Criminal Lok Ada-lat that met 192 times settled 1090 criminal matters.163 But when asked how many petty criminal cases were referred to the Criminal Lok Adalat, no one could provide an answer. Krishnan then went to observe how the Criminal Lok Adalat operated and it became apparent why the records office had no data on case-referrals. For one thing, the Criminal Lok Adalat is a dispute settlement body in name only. In reality all this forum 163. Interview with record bureau staff (July 24, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. does is to sign off on pre-arranged settlements reached between the state and the charged defendant.164 The proceeding takes place in the criminal courthouse, located about three miles away from the capital city's Civil Complex, specifically within the office of a criminal court judge (known as the metropolitan magistrate). The judge is at his desk while a female advocate, who serves as the titular second member of this "judicial panel," sits on the other side. (There is no third member present.) This Lok Adalat meets up to three times a week where between forty and fifty cases are disposed of in each session.165 One-by-one, a defendant enters the judge's office es-corted by a police officer. A clerk presents the judge with the defendant's file that explains the plea agreement reached with the state. The judge signs off on the matter and the case is reported as "settled." This episode takes just seconds to complete; once the judge signs the necessary forms, the defendant exits (presumably to jail or to pay a fine) and the next de-fendant comes in and the same process is repeated. That the Legal Ser-vices office finds no reason to maintain statistics on the number of cases that are referred to the Criminal Lok Adalat is understandable in view of this forum's 100% "settlement" rate. As an institution, the Criminal Lok Adalat acts more as an adminis- trative rubberstamp than as a dispute resolution forum. There are no lawyers or prosecutors present. There is no contestation of facts or nego-tiations regarding the terms of the settlement. Krishnan was informed that meetings between the defendant and the prosecutor obviously do occur prior to the Criminal Lok Adalat judge signing off on the plea agreement.166 And, furthermore, he was told that not all of the plea-bargaining meetings resulted in compromise. However, the Legal Ser-vices Authority office does not keep statistics of what transpires within these plea-bargaining meetings.167 We do not know, for example, what percentage of compoundable cases is settled beforehand and what per-centage is tried. The district Legal Services office only records (and high-lights) the supposed success-rate of the cases "settled" within the Criminal Lok Adalat. It is unclear why records for the Criminal Lok Adalat are kept in this manner. In civil matters the record keeping tends to be a bit more de-tailed but it too remains incomplete. For example, the Legal Services of-fice noted that last year within the capital district 132 out of 283 civil and 164. Krishnan observed the Criminal Lok Adalat on July 26, 2003. 165. Interview with Criminal Lok Adalat's presiding judge (July 26, 2003). 167. Interview with the Legal Services Authority (July 24, 2003). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR family law cases settled in pre-Lok Adalat negotiation meetings.168 Yet there was no breakdown on the types of civil matters settled or whether any litigants by-passed the pre-Lok Adalat meeting and went directly to the Lok Adalat itself. Separately kept statistics for 2002, added more confusion: 460 out of 510 divorce cases were settled in the Lok Adalat;169 168 out of 200 motor vehicle accident cases were settled in the Lok Adalat; and that 142 out of 200 "other civil matters" (mainly property disputes) were settled in the Lok Adalat. Furthermore, the Legal Services office had other rather puzzling data. In Bank Adalats—dispute resolution forums intended to bring about compromise between customers who have a grievance against the Bank of India—only 181 out of the 800 cases settled in 2002.172 In con-trast, the district's Water Company Adalat, which hears cases from indi-viduals with complaints against the city's Metro Water Supply and Sewage Board, received 152 cases in 2002 and settled 123 of them.173 The office also noted that thousands of cases have been settled in Jail Adalats —forums that occur in the jail cell of inmates who have been accused of committing a petty criminal offense but who lack the resources to post bail and thus have languished in custody for, in some cases, years.174 And once every three months the district Legal Services office holds a "mega-Lok Adalat," which is a one day camp organized at the city's central sports stadium where anywhere from 8,000 to 10,000 cases are brought. On average Krishnan was told that the settlement rate at these mega-Lok Adalats is about fifty percent.175 Yet how do we interpret any of these data? Along with the questions raised above, other issues come to mind. For example, how satisfied are the claimants that participate in Bank Adalats, Water Company Adalats, Jail Adalats, or mega-Lok Adalats—even when a settlement is reached? How effectively are the parties' claims being presented? Do lawyers act strategically vis-à-vis the judges as we witnessed above? Are judges the dominant figures parsing out justice as they see fit? And perhaps most importantly, has the desire for increasing the number of cases settled so GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. consumed those working within the process that they have lost focus on the substantive, concrete concerns of the average claimant? The evidence we have gathered and the queries we raise do place into question the ultimate fairness of Lok Adalats. As we have found, the Lok Adalat is not a single institution, but a cluster of kindred institutions. Not only are new variants evolving, but within each, those who operate them are improvising and new patterns are emerging. In spite of the tra-ditionalistic reference of the name, there is little drawing on indigenous practices; and in spite of the populist rhetoric, there is no evident com-munity input or participative character to the proceedings. These institu-tions tend to operate in a top-down fashion—scheduling, location, personnel, and agendas are all decided by the authorities who occupy their positions by virtue of state connections. These forums are domi-nated by judges both as organizers and presiders. Correspondingly, the role of lawyers is notably diminished compared to the regular courts. With little lawyer input and no recourse to appeal, presiding officers en-joy far greater discretion than in regular state courts. Judges may be pa-ternalistic, overbearing, or perfunctory in dealing with individual parties. They are not, however, necessarily more deliberative. Yet there are those who no doubt will be very critical of our findings and these ques-tions we raise. We sketch our critics' likely rebuttal in the next section. As we conclude, however, this point of view does little to blunt our con-cern about how Lok Adalats are functioning in modern India. A. "Gruff" Justice is Good (Enough) Justice . . is Indian Justice Since we first began our investigation of Lok Adalats nearly two years ago, we have faced recurrent criticism from their defenders.176 Crit-ics have accused us of viewing Lok Adalats through a Western, even co-lonial lens, reminding us that India is not the U.S., Britain, or Canada. Applying the standards we would use in the West to the Indian legal sys-tem is taken as an indication of insensitivity to cultural dynamics and as evidence of hubris. According to these defenders Lok Adalats need to be contextualized within the larger framework of India's legal system. The Lok Adalat was created to restore access to remedies and protections and to alleviate the 176. It should be noted that our critics' argument, which we set forth in this section, has been ex- pressed to us in verbal fashion. We have presented our findings and hypotheses to judges and lawyers in India and this has been their reaction to our claims. To date, we have not found anything in writing that captures their views that we are presenting here. This section thus is a summary that we hope does justice to our critics' position. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR institutional burden of millions of petty cases clogging the regular courts.177 Recall that there are many obstacles within the regular courts—particularly the lower courts—preventing disputants from receiving speedy, accessible justice. The most important aspect of the Lok Adalat is that it offers the aggrieved claimant whose case would otherwise sit in the regular courts for decades, at least some compensation now. We have to remember, these proponents argue, that in the big picture the cases that come before the Lok Adalats are rather petty. While to the individ-ual claimant her case has enormous personal significance, in most cases the claims are usually for small amounts of money and involve relatively minor issues.178 Even assuming that Lok Adalats throughout India operate as they do in the sites we observed—where cases are reviewed quickly and judges tend to act in a unilateral (if not harsh) manner—this is accept-able. The presiding judge of a Lok Adalat is an experienced adjudicator with a documented record of public service and has legal acumen. So even if the judge happens to address claimants gruffly or to treat the is-sues before him in a seemingly hurried manner, at the end of the day his decisions are usually on the mark—or at least they are close enough, so that the parties are better off than they were originally. Regardless of how gruff and perfunctory the justice dispensed, Lok Adalats improve the overall legal system. To ignore their contributions is to misunder-stand both how justice functions in India and the constraints on the path to greater access to justice in the future. We appreciate that many in India share a desperate desire to im- prove the condition of the legal system. But we question our critics' un-abashed acceptance that Lok Adalats—even with their flaws—are better for the entire legal system than nothing at all. Lok Adalats consume scarce resources of money, personnel, attention, and energy. These re-sources might be better employed to address the fundamental problems facing the courts in India. To persist on the Lok Adalat track without 177. Defenders also credit Lok Adalats with reducing the frequency of "under the table negotia- tions." Anyone familiar with how things work in India, the argument goes, knows that when a claimant has a grievance against, for example, a governmental electricity company or a similar agency, an easy way to resolve the dispute is quietly to bribe the relevant state official to fix the problem. Although by no means eliminating this behavior, the Lok Adalat provides an opportunity for claimants who disdain such corruption to pursue their cases within a legitimate judicial setting. 178. If the case is financially significant there is always the option of turning to arbitration, which in India is a formal, alternative dispute forum designed to handle large claims where large amounts of money are at stake. But even here, an agreement only goes into effect where both parties agree to the proposed terms set forth by the arbitrator. In 1996 India passed the Arbitration and Conciliation Or-dinance, which sought to update the Arbitration Act of 1940. One of the most important aspects of the 1996 law is that it significantly reduces the ability of parties to set aside the arbitration agreement through litigation in the regular state courts. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. critical examination of its costs and alternatives strikes us as manifesting all unwarranted pessimism about the possibilities for court reform that truly enhances access to justice. B. Lok Adalats as a Moving Target We anticipate that there will be further extensions and enlargements of the Lok Adalat cluster and perhaps refinements and cutbacks as well. Within the past year there have been additional statutory initiatives to bolster the Lok Adalat. In 2002 Parliament enacted a new set of amend-ments to the Indian Civil Procedure Code. Among them, Section 89 enlarges the power of courts to refer cases to Lok Adalats.179 Section 89 reads: (1)Where it appears to the court that there exist elements of a settle-ment which may be acceptable to the parties, the court shall formulate the terms of the settlement and give them to the parties for their ob-servations and after receiving the observations of the parties, the court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for – (a) arbitration; (b) conciliation; (c) judicial settlement including settlement through Lok Adalat; or (2) Where a dispute has been referred – (a) for arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the Arbitra-tion and Conciliation Act, 1996 shall apply as if the proceedings for arbitration or conciliation were referred for settlement under the provisions of that Act; (b) to Lok Adalat, the court shall refer the same to the Lok Ada-lat in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 20 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 and all other provi-sions of that Act shall apply in respect of the dispute so referred to the Lok Adalat; (c) for judicial settlement, the court shall refer the same to a suit-able institution or person and such institution or person shall be deemed to be a Lok Adalat and all the provisions of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 [39 of 1987] shall apply as if the dis-pute were referred to a Lok Adalat under the provisions of that Act; 179. Indian Code Civ. Proc. § 89. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR (d) for mediation, the court shall effect a compromise between the parties and shall follow such procedure as may be prescribed.180 Under one plausible reading of Section 89 a court now has the power to steer cases into Lok Adalats, accompanied by the judge's for-mulation of a resolution, whenever the judge believes that a settlement between the disputing parties is possible, even if the parties do not share this opinion or consent to the transfer. Presumably if a settlement were not arranged in the Lok Adalat, the case would return to the docket of the court. But this understanding is rendered problematic by another new provision, this an amendment to the Legal Services Authority Act (LSAA) added by Parliament in 2002.181 Section 22D of the LSAA states: The Permanent Lok Adalat shall, while conducting conciliation pro-ceedings or deciding a dispute on merit under the Act, be guided by the principles of natural justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice, and shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Pro-cedure, 1908 and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.182 At least some Lok Adalats are thus authorized to go beyond arrang- ing settlements to "decid[e] . . a dispute on merit," and they are given broad discretion to do this according to their general notions of justice.183 Even without this extension of the mandate as mediators, Lok Adalat judges already possess power that seems overbearing and coercive to the parties before them—especially poor and un-represented parties.184 The Indian Bar Council has been very critical of 22D particularly for allowing Lok Adalats to rule now on the merits of cases without the agreement of the parties. Further, many Indian lawyers worry that a claimant seeking justice in the regular state courts might end up having her case transferred without her consent to a Lok Adalat (via section 89 181. C.I.S. Part II-A (2002), Legal Services Authority (Amendment) Act, 2002, Indian Parliament Act No. 37 of 2002, New Delhi, 11 June 2002. 182. Id. The invocation of "justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice" is reminiscent of the formula "justice, equity and good conscience" which was the residual source of law in British India. See Derrett, supra note 84. 183. The new Section 22D formula, "justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice" (again reminiscent of the "justice, equity, and good conscience" formula, see Derrett, supra note 84) differs significantly from the formula embedded in Section 20(4) of the Legal Services Au-thority Act which specifies that the Lok Adalat should pursue "a compromise or settlement between the parties" and in doing so "shall be guided by legal principles and the principles of justice, equity, and fair play." 184. The coercive potential of mediation in developing societies has been especially highlighted by Professor Sally Merry some years back. See Sally Merry, The Social Organization of Mediation in Non-Industrial Societies: Implications for Informal Community Justice in America, in The Politics of In-formal Justice 17 (Richard Abel ed., 1982). As opposed to the mediators in Professor Merry's study, Lok Adalat judges have wielded—and with Section 22D in effect will probably continue to wield—their power with little to no check. GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. of the Code of Civil Procedure). And once in the Lok Adalat, the claim-ant may then have a judgment "on merit" issued against her, which un-der section 22E of the Legal Services Authority Act would be "final and binding"185 with no appeal. In December 2002, lawyers across much of India went on strike to protest these amendments.186 In addition, the protestors filed a writ peti-tion in the Supreme Court seeking to invalidate section 22D. In a short but confusing judgment the Court dismissed the petition and upheld the amendments as free of any constitutional infirmity.187 The Court went on to state that the amendments to the LSAA, including section 22D, would take effect once "Permanent Lok Adalats" were "set up at an early date."188 What "Permanent Lok Adalats" means is unclear. From reading both the 2002 amendments of the Legal Services Authority Act, as well as the Court's judgment, it appears as though no Permanent Lok Adalats have yet been established in India. Presumably such Permanent Lok Adalats would be confined to matters dealing with public utilities. But this turns out to be a potentially elastic category, including not only transport services, postal, telegraph and telephone services, electric and water services, sanitation, hospital, and insurance services, but also "any service which the Central or State Governments . . may in the public in-terest . . declare to be a public utility for purposes of this chapter."189 Recall that according to the statute that created the Pension Lok Ada-lats, these forums were to be a "permanent and continuous body." So, is it possible now for Pension Lok Adalats to issue non-appealable judg-ments on the merits of a case? Might other Lok Adalats be assimilated to the "Permanent" and "public utility" categories? Judges and lawyers with whom Krishnan spoke expressed differing views on the exact impact of the Court ruling and of the new amendments. Needless to say, more research (and clarification from judges and government officials) is re-quired before knowing how these amendments and this judgment will af-fect those pursuing legal claims. These recent events underline the extent to which the scope and powers of Lok Adalats and their relation to other legal institutions re-main fluid and unresolved. Such changes represent a series of improvisa-tions by proponents trying to strengthen and extend what they perceive as a promising institutional initiative. At a conference on access to justice 185. Legal Services Authority Act § 22E (2002). 186. For a discussion of this strike, see J. Venkatesan, Lawyers Defy SC, Strike Work, The Hindu, Dec. 19, 2002, available at 2002 WL 104070994. 187. Pandey v. Union of India, Writ Petition 543/2002. 189. Legal Services Authority Act § 22A (2002). GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM BREAD FOR THE POOR in New Delhi in November 2002, Galanter spoke about Lok Adalats with a number of High Court and Supreme Court judges. Almost uniformly they regarded Lok Adalats as a signal success. As one judge put it, in a twist on Marie Antoinette, they are "bread for the poor. Later they can have cake."190 On the other hand, critics see in these moves portents of a dismantling of legality in favor of paternalistic, intuitive, "kadi justice" for the poor.191 The absence of appeals, the exclusion of lawyers, and the shift of decisional standards from "legal principles" to "principles of jus-tice" suggest a major enlargement of the presiding judge's discretion and a robust faith that the poor have more to gain from benign paternalism than from juristic or popular legality. Each side the argument relies on assertions about the working of Lok Adalats that are based on supposition rather than investigation. We hope that research of the kind we propose will help to transform the de-bate, and the further development of the Lok Adalat institution, into an exchange in which aspirations for access to justice are tested by empirical observation and analysis. 190. Interview by Galanter with a judicial officer (Nov. 2002). 191. "Kadi justice" here refers not to the actual practice of Muslim kadis (qadis, kazis) but to Max Weber's use of the term kadijustiz "to describe the administration of justice which is oriented not at fixed rules of formally rational law but at the ethical, religious, political, or otherwise expediential pos-tulates of substantively rational law." M. Rheinstein, Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society 213, n.48 (1954). An Indian synonym is "banyan tree justice." GalanterKrishnan25 4/6/2004 12:19 PM HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. Appendix A192 Number of Judges, Common Law and Civil Law Countries Year Judges193 Judges Common Law Countries Civil Law Countries For a discussion of this table, consult footnote 2. 192. All population estimates from the US census bureau web site. U.S. Census Bureau, Interna- tional Data Base Summary Demographic Data, at http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbsum.html (data updated July 17, 2003). England and Wales population estimated at 89% of UK population. 193. Department for Constitutional Affairs, Judicial Appointments, at http://www.dca .gov.uk/judapp.htm (as of Dec. 1, 2003) (England and Wales); Debra Cohen & Sandra Longtin, World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems, at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/wfbcjcan.txt (last visted Jan. 25, 2004) (Canada); Pistor, supra note 1, at 246 (Malaysia, India, Taiwan, and South Korea); European Research Network on Judicial Statistics, Working Papers. Bologna: Edizioni Scientifiche (Germany); United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, Sixth United Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, 131 (covering the period 1995–1997), available at http://www.uncjin.org/Statistics/WCTS/WCTS6/Publication.pdf (Denmark); Loic Cadet, Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Delay. The French Perspective, in Civil Justice in Crisis 291, 343 (A.A.S. Zuckerman ed., 1999) (France); The Secretariat of the Judicial Reform Council, The Japanese Judicial System (July 1999), available at http://kantei.go.jp/foreign/judiciary/0620system.html (Japan).
Eur J Clin PharmacolDOI 10.1007/s00228-015-1896-x CYP2B6 rs2279343 polymorphism is associated with smokingcessation success in bupropion therapy Paulo Roberto Xavier Tomaz1 & Juliana Rocha Santos1 & Jaqueline Scholz Issa2 &Tânia Ogawa Abe 2 & Patrícia Viviane Gaya2 & José Eduardo Krieger1 &Alexandre Costa Pereira1,3 & Paulo Caleb Júnior Lima Santos1,3 Received: 21 April 2015 / Accepted: 26 June 2015
Smith, S.L., Comparisons of Selected with the Flat and Slice Serves of Male Varsity Tennis Players in Proceedings of the Na- THE RACE DOWN FROM tional Symposium on Racquet Sports, J.L. Groppel, (ed.), University of Illinois, Champaign, 17,1979. "Impact Absorption in Extended Downhill Trabert, T., The Slice Serve, Tennis Strokes and Strategies, Simon and