Marys Medicine

i nnovative buildings Merchandise Lofts Building Green Roof Case StudyToronto, Ontario In 1910 Robert Simpson Co Ltd.
constructed a five-storey, reinforcedconcrete and steel structure, which wasused for wagon storage and as a harnessshop. In 1916 an 11-storey mail-orderbuilding and warehouse was added at the south end of the complex. The finalconstruction phase of the complex tookplace in 1930 when additions were made at the north and west sides.
Throughout the last decades of the Figure 1: Merchandise Building Green Roof 20th century numerous development plansfor the then vacant Simpson's building were put forth to the City of Toronto. However, each of the projectplans fell through. In 1997, Cresford Development of Toronto introduced a plan to construct a new, mixed-use(residential, retail, and commercial) complex. As the plan incorporated more residential development into anarea that had been a concern of the City for some time, it was approved for its development permit.
The building, now known as the Merchandise Building, consists of 504 loft residential units, 529 above-grade carparking spaces, 246 bicycle spaces, 4 loading bays, a 30,000-square-foot food store, and 35,300 square feet ofretail and office space.There are nine styles of luxury condominiums ranging in size from 565 square feet to1765 square feet, which are priced from $148,900 to $425,000 respectively. At street level the building featuresretail space including a major grocery store chain and a restaurant. A twelfth storey was added to the structureto make space for an indoor pool, party room, dining facilities, and an outside dipping pool.
The roof is landscaped with a prairie meadow growing in two green roof plots. The green roof proper is approximately 10,000 square feet and is surrounded by an additional 15,000 square feet of hard surface concrete pavers. The decision to install the green roof was made by the development in the final phases of the redevelopment project in order to maximize the area available for planting without needing to adjust the structural loading capacity of the building.
The total redesign and regeneration of this 1,070,000-square-footcomplex is believed to be the largest of its kind in North America.
• Building Type: 12-storey, multi-use condominium complex • Units: • Typical Population: • Location: 155 Dalhousie StreetToronto, Ontario • Status: Renovations/conversion of complex completed in February 2000 • Cost of green roof retrofit: • Area of green roof: 10,000 square feet of planting area15,000 square feet of decorative concrete pavers • Green roof type: • Saturated weight: >30 lbs per cubic foot • Developer: Cresford Development Inc.
• Architect: Paul NorthgraveNorthgrave Architect Inc.
• Landscape Architect: David Lieberman, David Lieberman ArchitectsTerry McGlade, Perennial Gardens The 10,000 square foot green roof and corresponding 15,000 square foot hard surface area was designed, supplied and installed for just over $200,000 (approximately $8.00-10.00 per square foot).
Green Roof Materials (includes supply & install) Plants (includes supply & install) Ornamentals (galvanized steel planting structure) Structural Considerations
The original building was constructed of steel and concrete. The extra weight of therecreational facilities (a green roof, lap pool and sun terrace) would have been in excess of the roofs original loading capacity. In order for the existing building to withstand theadditional weight, the entire roof was reinforced with steel girders.
It is very important to note that while the weight of the roof was a concern, the need for thesteel girders was mostly due to the extra loading from the lap pool and not the green roof.
The saturated weight of the green roof is less than 30 pounds per cubic foot. In fact, thedecision to use a green roof system, instead of traditional planter boxes, was made becauseof its low weight.
Installation and Technical Issues
The original plan for the roof was to create a container garden on top of a traditional roof.
However, to increase the planting space available, the project developers commissioned a greenroof after construction had begun and the roof had been installed.
The installation of the green roof on the Merchandise Lofts posed three major technicalproblems:1.
getting the materials (growing medium, plants, slabs, etc.) on to the roof of a 12-storeystructure, working in a construction site, and, using a pre-existing roof as the base to build the green roof plots on.
The problem of getting the material to the roof was overcome with cranes that were alreadyon the site for the building renovation. The landscape designers worked closely with thecontractors to avoid conflicting schedules and avoided problems that might have occurreddue to implementing the green roof during the major construction project. The designers of the roof had to overcome some issues with placement of the plots and plants due to thelocation of some building mechanical equipment that were installed on the original roof.
Green Roof Characteristics
Type and WarrantyThe Merchandise Building green roof is an accessible extensive system that uses selectedelements of Soprema's Sopranature green roofing system. However, as it was placed on top of the original gravel-top roof, it incorporates many of the original roof features includingmembrane and flashing. The roof on which the green roof elements were placed upon holdsa standard 10-year roof warranty. Selected elements of the green roof are warrantied, but as it is not a complete green roof system, there is no universal warranty. The plants werewarrantied for one-year effective from the date of purchase.
Growing MediumThe growing medium used was a mixture of Soprema's Sopraflor-X, which is designedspecifically for extensive green roof systems, and "grow-bark" potting soil. Sopraflor-X iscomprised of an unconsolidated mixture of organic matter and mineral aggregates with a particle size of 16 mm. Soprema claims its growing medium will provide optimal waterretention, permeability, structural stability and density.The grow-bark potting soil iscomprised of soil, peat, manure and compost.The mixture was selected for its light weightand ability to adhere to the plants in windy conditions.The growing medium was appliedacross the plots in varying depths (from two to eighteen-inches).
Plant SelectionThe primary issue when selecting the plants and designing the green roof plan, was theexcessive wind and sun exposure. The green roof is located on the roof of the twelfthstorey and has southern exposure. Native species, such as grasses, that function well in extreme conditions were selected. The plants were also grown in ‘plug' sizes that ensuredfirm roots in the shallow growing medium.
37 different species of native Ontario plants were included in the design. Examples of theselected species are: Switch Grass (Panicum Virgatum), Hairy Beardtongue (Penstemon hirsutus),Gray-headed Coneflower (Ratibida pinnata), Pale Purple Coneflower (Echinacea palida),Woodland Sunflower (Helianthus divaricatus), and Sedum (spurium red, Ewersii, sexangulare,kamtachaticum, spurium Album). The total budget for the plants was $67,000, which includedtheir transport to the site and installation.
Irrigation & DrainageCurrently, the plants are irrigated through a drip irrigation system, which cost $12,500 topurchase and install. No specialized drainage system was installed for the Merchandise Buildinggreen roof. It is using the pre-existing drainage system from the traditional gravel roof.
Monitoring & Maintenance
No monitoring of the green roof has taken place or is planned.
There have been no funds allocated for maintenance or replacement of lost plants. However,as the building will be governed by a condominium association, the decision to create a budgetfor future replanting, reproofing or repair may be made at a later date.
The major benefit that the green roof offered the developer was the ability to create outdoorrecreational space for future tenants with maximum green space and minimal hard surfacecoverage.While originally the roof was to be comprised of container gardens, the greenroof's low weight, allowed for the design of additional green space without creating theneed to re-examine and make adjustments to the loading capacity of the roof.
The Merchandise Lofts gave the landscape designers the opportunity to experiment withnew light-weight growing mediums and plant selection.
The author would like to thank the following individuals for their help in developing thiscase study: Kathy Kinnear, Intracorp Development Inc.
David Lieberman, David Lieberman ArcitectsTerry McGlade, Perennial GardensElyse Parker, City of Toronto For more information about building solutions and best practices visit the Canada Mortgageand Housing Corporation Web site at:


Wus and stm in shoot meristem regulation

Development 129, 3195-3206 (2002) Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2002DEV0437 The WUSCHEL and SHOOTMERISTEMLESS genes fulfil complementary roles in Arabidopsis shoot meristem regulation Michael Lenhard1, Gerd Jürgens2 and Thomas Laux1,* 1Institut für Biologie III, Universität Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany2Universität Tübingen, ZMBP – Entwicklungsgenetik, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany*Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected])

Pharmaceutical Regulation in the United States: A Confluence of Influences1 By Reuben A . Guttman2 ©2012 Gr ant & Eisenhofer P.A . • Pharmaceutical Regulation in the United States: A Confluence of Influences1 an incomplete picture. It is the totality of limited as to dose or how the dose may be these influences, and their interplay with administered.9 each other, that either impact or have the